IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus on Deploying QUIC v1 with HTTP/3

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Thu, 06 May 2021 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81F23A245D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g_fVnEPbuzUI for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A24653A245B for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id y124-20020a1c32820000b029010c93864955so5426666wmy.5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uCH9eCkJdZxxdmM4w0W2KzcnwzxYKcm3vWL+mAFUeR8=; b=gI8O8p6MaELZMt9a7LMOZfnS08h5DSUbrzmUkVS4EHx9aZR+zNTwPq5+l556yvlaTi Gr8Y9b8eRl1uyev2+Sn6NRL988Iv2jzwvcXrxGQyqfNktBjOvMmdjKegc1BPuUoBOchS RH44U6tlPA78G2zrz+HAeDaKPEYvzqFM/oRkIum+IdruWju0CvdlnFmmh/r/uWmy7epx oyHYYybLycMnK/uMb8oRUcZcmsSDgIEFTM3iF9Jt73rZUgJLv/kF2kpaX5o0knMuIHzB LBfnpXkpXpFwetRcrlZxRJ5yMGbSgHk2/HM/D9rKbl4UiMrxvnXQOwXO3clkD0znfukY IcIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uCH9eCkJdZxxdmM4w0W2KzcnwzxYKcm3vWL+mAFUeR8=; b=WvO5JOp3vKJzudXT8q7vuRyo7nDZFw6+E8kR84BdFUEtqa2qAkdJ7CWWNCipuWya2x 2tIiVf0UetMpdkgH3LplnYXQd5QrM4y5RVvKlHjRKlt9Wp7iPqQ9+3NSvXImpW7sACc3 THgUKVcJa+CXTSCxzNyJymc1qDrWMEJcoLxEKCbeYMUHxkHWON0NWcEqi22IPSu7LQnc kmoruj5HTPF+LmDRzZhBDxKWV9eABiTpR09x6lWSwsJFhFri/gWjcnpXRojvHBK4xId8 NPHXLIMZ9PAJBhtaSS7j2hbcuqsNZfEXLWYNsOrQde9ePy96UOA8nI09kpOeoKMLkIPp c+oQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mEw7uftOfNqbCRdotty9to9ECJqDlFs455TiMuw57geh+yR+W pCgYDXkQRX98m6EEMJpmNork7Wi0ngbgaLgNyZm94A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJye462ovJONB/MDFIprxaJYVIChH9Gj202PPy1i2sznn18QXQVuzBXIpirzk3nKcLScuDrtTq5ybkYPLNkVJhA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2296:: with SMTP id 22mr15922327wmf.165.1620311594948; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9obE-Dbm5Rwmr=h_34vaps1pcv36Jg0MTS_o0mZHEF1FvA@mail.gmail.com> <6740dcaa-3c43-faf2-826e-1cb3bb113aff@gmx.de> <CADdTf+gKZwcZD12he2YaGpWpOePZp_EB4J0QoXL6ozfx0BgJDg@mail.gmail.com> <CADdTf+h=iEjJ6k6FmDBOhYY7iLTjyDPWBejdU+ocyUCiGA09yQ@mail.gmail.com> <6b0ce1c8-bbe4-f8cd-b9c9-8e2eb378bd6d@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <6b0ce1c8-bbe4-f8cd-b9c9-8e2eb378bd6d@gmx.de>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:33:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gMzxNr59x_WMJF_G5pcywc05HcxEXApSR4PFSxe8xPM1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus on Deploying QUIC v1 with HTTP/3
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b56d105c1aa3173"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/naFWDQOZoNcq612xeS-Mo37vApI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 14:33:24 -0000

This seems sensible to me.

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:24 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> Am 06.05.2021 um 06:11 schrieb Matt Joras:
> > ...
> >         You may want to clarify what *exactly* you mean by "the QUIC
> RFCs".
> >
> >
> >     Lucas was referring to C430:
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C430
> >     <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C430>
> >
> > ...Excepting the qpack and http documents. I hit the send button too
> > quickly.
>
> See? That's why I was asking.
>
> So we're discussing just -invariants, -transport, -tls, and -recovery,
> right?
>

Yes, only -invariants, -transport, -tls, and -recovery

>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email