Re: [EToSat] Interop runner with satellite links

Sebastian Endres <basti.endres@fau.de> Fri, 18 February 2022 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <basti.endres@fau.de>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C663A101A; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 04:02:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fau.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqQPCKK1Ov9V; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 04:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.11.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D809D3A100D; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 04:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-rz-smart.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (mx-rz-smart.rrze.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:1025::1e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K0Vgf1H55z8vb3; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:02:38 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fau.de; s=fau-2021; t=1645185758; bh=KoRCTwXo/Nfx0Jodia5Yl2f71q0q2tVEvsMjxzCIGbM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:To:CC: Subject; b=YdsS0jywvfnr1seT0fMDbaCtu9WZWz108mNbsAvKo4Si8t7Z7+BfB/sfe2S6zu7og RohxQybQyH72S4UJ3DJLZ0AWrhXI8edgQLZO8p6PxtWrbZvlZQcuncTkIOiiEq+yoX vxcOj6izTZQdzR/dPZgNd9+q42KQg1wW14vCh1cLls5E/jwqX7WO4ye+sPViGKXE8X 7+/LENU4xi3OTS6xvbquHhTbZh2xFUryJJgfSoW6gfsX2cFKMGgBbh8H4FLsVMI+t/ eORqo65rMZXsM2vPvgEznMdhgFn/nQaqts8KMtN7zomq3lr/lNx5+9RuAsQEr8nZZv HBNf0Lhxpg+Vg==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boeck4.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (RRZE)
X-RRZE-Flag: Not-Spam
X-RRZE-Submit-IP: 2001:a62:1410:5501:11f1:d232:2725:ac70
Received: from prometheus.sedrubal.de (unknown [IPv6:2001:a62:1410:5501:11f1:d232:2725:ac70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: U2FsdGVkX1+gp43u3rhe/PSoD9R77doN994oQtiakgs=) by smtp-auth.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4K0VgZ6lclz8vXm; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:02:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Sebastian Endres <basti.endres@fau.de>
To: etosat@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org
Cc: joerg.deutschmann@fau.de
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Interop runner with satellite links
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:02:34 +0100
Message-ID: <2321206.ElGaqSPkdT@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
In-Reply-To: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
References: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/pBx60mJpfzCQWZmpIKKrMQjPNAM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:02:49 -0000

Dear all,

we've published a pre-print of our paper in which we present the QUIC-Interop-runner extended to include satellite scenarios and our measurement results using numerous publicly available QUIC implementations:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08228

Best regards,

Sebastian

On Mittwoch, 29. September 2021 21:38:05 CET Sebastian Endres wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available online: https://interop.sedrubal.de/
> 
> A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available for every combination.
> 
> In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss.
> 
> Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link characteristics to the official QUIC interop runner?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> EToSat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
>