Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 09 June 2024 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531F8C14F6B8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 00:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="KjZxTBWx"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="ZiJFU915"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXKodMBY_xZ6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 00:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92917C14F702 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 00:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A54513800F5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 03:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 Jun 2024 03:38:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1717918719; x=1718005119; bh=UwIl7I91RCiFgxRlOi4ryPtQ5UbCqcDswne qMsPWvGE=; b=KjZxTBWxC4EfPagWT9ANHQCk+U7XUn/WPU4nKnHq3xaGF3vsOCs Abx87U0lzn/0vINuFwN51aByPNfREBs/E16kf83ImICab5X7ptH46Oe2i028JbQV LZpRb6kG91JOxE8VvF/iKlVk/3+RN64JH8Bf4bnw6/PWSq0Be1i8GWYQDeXshQH8 fvnxzEdgN5h2KM4N9evn6ABnxcYizUMeYlPhWdUd6DPKbsNPJ/FcjV5wL3coI/6S /LrXbeYpoFK+VJBmOgN1tnyf0cLAH4jQLnTN5789TxOrTmZqfddk9/p40AtN0J+h 96D+Gaus3mDsODasjNEqgGhKKPlZRrpDj8g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1717918719; x= 1718005119; bh=UwIl7I91RCiFgxRlOi4ryPtQ5UbCqcDswneqMsPWvGE=; b=Z iJFU915U1UPwMpK7ExkPfxJp3YMCWUjXAiXWEc6GkgPttvu+9DcYLKGZoYQNCDQW XbNuzO6AEcn0NIcczh6cjsyXG58eg1ymzhwKohBy+qxjCWtb0cV7MMlGayqhLWep lrNQjcGsXhgCPSdrBZ7M/nYe1fjdtVjKpLTyUTVosDeLv2gnUxfdtOxPgWv8UnBt hdkTGTvKVt9Wv1QbVLoq6qEasVUx563IRkQRp9G87ukUQmkD7hh4QqqVx9VadZl+ IYkQO5MOn+AQG8lAIxkYkJPvIsNOKJRFheLgI0EqQvSB4hR/8sYWNEj9rjsEAL3q ckdaZaMTuIg1K59i958ag==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_1tlZuCbcJhim53qjLZa-oQe2h7FWOtyQDGKvn3n2uHfpCXTq4NhtQ> <xme:_1tlZoi6c07uxUStPKKmZaUgBQtXsxdLjFyWGqWSdMUGsHyM2Ma1FWAw8XeNFXY9G QnUSyjJ71Ja1HYLvA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:_1tlZhn0nD2gKDBZ2HNcMcPwlL6Acfp3Fr1qiSQqyECb8Uy-B_FBhWs2f0Gd_M0>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedtiedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_1tlZszQETkoZWcur1oCmsuZ4VV6p5uSENe8FvCC52Y51aZZLb7ISw> <xmx:_1tlZjTzgO7_DHMxD89wsGa79d61IMsl7McGvURAy0Kl1Jq_kDBrrA> <xmx:_1tlZnbhPjTDAkhVW20zD-ogUWJHOnVddFtOn5Hhsm7bxqJla9P5kg> <xmx:_1tlZsSUu1yOSI99b9h3Eei1XjI_TxihhmD7H_2fMUOrpRIzYpppIg> <xmx:_1tlZuey-wSv53g5L5Biv-BLwpPpaaOfblH-TDwaRm8kTyl6baH7U9tg>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 03:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0544114781922726765=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20240609073840.92917C14F702@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 00:38:40 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: VT6BU4SOUH3URKAPQX5C5JKDRPUVSOTF
X-Message-ID-Hash: VT6BU4SOUH3URKAPQX5C5JKDRPUVSOTF
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/psKa-8B7Jx3xfzdGGv636nLkoiM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/multipath (+1/-0/💬22)
  1 issues created:
  - Should we allow for multiple paths over the same 4-tuple or not? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/378 

  8 issues received 22 new comments:
  - #378 Should we allow for multiple paths over the same 4-tuple or not? (2 by huitema, tzaeschke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/378 [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #371 Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global? (5 by Yanmei-Liu, michael-eriksson, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/371 [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #366 Should we require explicit Abandon after path time-out? (3 by Yanmei-Liu, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/366 [design] 
  - #362 Where does RFC9000 talk about "refusing a path"? (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/362 [question] 
  - #338 Clarify how new CIDs are allocated (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/338 [design] [explicit path ID] 
  - #332 Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? (2 by LPardue, Yanmei-Liu)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #328 Designing odd/even path-id, or not. (5 by LPardue, huitema, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] 
  - #313 When to CID expire if using Unique Path ID? (3 by LPardue, Yanmei-Liu, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/313 [explicit path ID] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/multipath (+7/-0/💬10)
  7 pull requests submitted:
  - Editorial: Move "sending ACKs" subsection (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/380 
  - Editorial: Merge of overview into intro & subsections (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/379 
  - Rewrite the path close section to specify symmetric Abandon (by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/377 
  - Rename transport parameter initial_max_paths to initial_max_path_id (by Yanmei-Liu)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/376 
  - Recommendations regarding CID allocation and Path ID continuity (by qdeconinck)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/375 
  - There is always a valid CID now for each path (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/374 
  - [~] Endpoints MUST send Path Abandon for path closure(including idle … (by Yanmei-Liu)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/373 

  7 pull requests received 10 new comments:
  - #377 Rewrite the path close section to specify symmetric Abandon (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/377 
  - #375 Recommendations regarding CID allocation and Path ID continuity (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/375 
  - #374 There is always a valid CID now for each path (3 by Yanmei-Liu, mirjak, qdeconinck)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/374 
  - #373 [~] Endpoints MUST send Path Abandon for path closure(including idle … (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/373 
  - #372 Cleanup MAX_PATHS (2 by Yanmei-Liu, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/372 
  - #331 Use even numbers for path ID (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/331 [needs-discussion] 
  - #329 Split path identifiers as odd-even for client and server initiated (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/329 [needs-discussion] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2
* https://github.com/quicwg/multipath
* https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency
* https://github.com/quicwg/reliable-stream-reset