New Liaison Statement, "Reply LS on Security Considerations for MPQUIC"

Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org> Fri, 26 July 2024 22:23 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org>
To: Peter Schmitt <Peter.Schmitt@huawei.com>, Susanna Kooistra <3GPPLiaison@etsi.org>
Subject: New Liaison Statement, "Reply LS on Security Considerations for MPQUIC"
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172203262835.1353196.14138812194442531980@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:23:48 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: XIV5BEWJWRSY7QODCOZNFDUYQYYPZYQH
CC: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>, Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>, QUIC Discussion List <quic@ietf.org>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>, liaison-coordination@iab.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/qhwUCpbAj757p3WUNDQCuSM4Slk>

Title: Reply LS on Security Considerations for MPQUIC
Submission Date: 2024-07-26
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1944/

From: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Susanna Kooistra <3GPPLiaison@etsi.org>, Peter Schmitt <Peter.Schmitt@huawei.com>
Cc: QUIC Discussion List <quic@ietf.org>,Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>,Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>,Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>,Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
Response Contacts: Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>,Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
Technical Contacts: 
Purpose: In response

Referenced liaison: LS on Security considerations for MPQUIC (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1934/)

Body: 1. Description

Thanks for reaching out to the QUIC working group [1].

We would like to note that the multipath extension of QUIC, as specified in draft-ietf-quic-multipath, retains all the security features of RFC 9000 [2] and RFC 9001 [3], respectively. The security consideration section of the extension draft therefore only contains additional considerations specific to use of multiple simultaneous paths. As of draft-ietf-quic-multipath-09 [4], published 21 June 2024, the Security Considerations section has been populated. The working group is still developing the draft including these considerations under working group consensus, receiving further updates in draft-ietf-quic-multipath-10 [5], published 18 July 2024.

We welcome review and input from all sources. Please raise issues or suggestions in the form of GitHub pull requests to https://github.com/quicwg/multipath [6].

2. Upcoming Meetings

IETF 121 2-8 November 2024, Dublin, Ireland
IETF 122 15-21 March 2025, Bangkok, Thailand

3. References

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/quic/about/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9001 
[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/09/
[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/10/
[6] https://github.com/quicwg/multipath
Attachments:

    Reply LS on Security Considerations for MPQUIC
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2024-07-26-quic-3gpp-tsgsa-sa2-3gpp-tsgsa-sa3-3gpp-tsgct-ct4-3g-reply-ls-on-security-considerations-for-mpquic-attachment-1.docx

New Liaison Statement, "Reply LS on Security Cons… Liaison Statement Management Tool