Re: Deadlocking in the transport

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C702D12E8A8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEVW9AV15pVp for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2403126C83 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g10so521715qtj.12 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UcLCC4/VqyI2TlRRkC4yWQPRWYUV3SAT4P/pM8Y/KC8=; b=TXPjueZyKZ5QwhkLOAts57gTVGqN5mXvZwCjAqxb5ZV75zcDXq6f61K2X/qQpT0z3D 6f7+iDyiBPP77XUVuBzk6S0Qyr1c/AxPpTwDZo2XUsmE3Rtt37eos8H0p4bN7q+iKvhh /NqGim1uCtOvW6BpsJnAQwML+nyPWljdcw61d5RTh9bCWWtkGKZHIhS4i4aYbMPru7xH jDhOhvRg5aosbXczcJOYNR1bj0K2iGPNzbjOmqkscWgQ0oXGlY+zlknWTgjZ3QzUPzLl Muerg0trrU92qMpmvHIpNKPEsfdamoKPlvmDz2CpDLnmiBf6h9nE2lWelqRB2I7jz+Lu NtRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UcLCC4/VqyI2TlRRkC4yWQPRWYUV3SAT4P/pM8Y/KC8=; b=dk0U60yrAifU54b7rNEbmBlCrwOMA3KTPDjxVqZ+o/LLLt0K8mJAFJ110hEgL97h+X RJn6UbB2HenkYKrKNEkh/lV7FUaPcbCW7kLXI/rTsam85X1M3thp0edWMHkuvsNw29lL ugi2OYVja36qkfigVWOCx420RTOIXEo+MddhEtp7Rcfai7f9in2LeV/jR4PPCYz/pwu8 uwS/GBR2gg3RugPbHW+yim3Pnps9uKGma0aULTyCSz8eOx8M22ejgjTPI25R5l2jemYc uUMwaj1dtOE1Kpl4jyMUtWn1Y/NbHRiJ2QgvMSrQJXA303MRZYIOrFh9MWdrMVlkpdZW Mv0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfc5LwbnLxfa4hghvRAzU3m4ALt6gtCzQtRSjEFnNszOvo7Jq9c cGe/WZfKPaONDik4x8fvWu/dMw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovE7fHBiSELAt9JZte5BNHd1aj55yde9HMEsaxodwH15pDgty7P/VaiZQYiP//SEGhg+tQdJA==
X-Received: by 10.200.25.228 with SMTP id s33mr5290638qtk.57.1515649975928; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-45715890.dyn.optonline.net. [69.113.88.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k3sm11328393qtj.40.2018.01.10.21.52.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:52:53 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Charles 'Buck' Krasic <ckrasic@google.com>
Subject: Re: Deadlocking in the transport
Message-ID: <20180111055253.GC21534@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Charles 'Buck' Krasic <ckrasic@google.com>
References: <20180110194716.GA30573@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAGD1bZYiDOakLYNppMBr=99JreX3Xr2zkS7O2DRNfvr_o0NUbg@mail.gmail.com> <20180110200646.GB30573@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAGD1bZa-ZOw5J6oSWBYdk3uYHOpGvak+vwGp0XsZB44zbLvRrw@mail.gmail.com> <20180110202357.GC30573@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAGD1bZbPM3wnatLLN5938wGPo3e1qmxnGzobSTym6XX3W8FNJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU3CQkvd7m+G80sCOPJfzb_=HonbRDSQJC8wqD_uWoj0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAGD1bZbrtMEJE-OOXqG02yWmHy_2baEvaZu=rFCBTtcq94JrOg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWtmprf291pBgTOrfi6yU9tXSfKi5J5uQpm7Z4JHuiGWg@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR08MB24231DA846126B51A83DC420DA110@CY4PR08MB2423.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR08MB24231DA846126B51A83DC420DA110@CY4PR08MB2423.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/rsE_SRwKuYFRQdeq7uK5_kjqnms>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:52:59 -0000

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:55:46PM +0000, Mike Bishop wrote:
> No disagreement.  When choosing which stream *with pending data* to make
> progress on, I think choosing the higher-priority stream is necessary
> rather than advisory.  With H2, we're talking about client preferences
> about server responses which might not be ready yet, so it's always
> advisory to the server.  Here, we're talking about the application's
> preferences about its own data that it has already handed off.
> That's something that happened within the HTTP/2 implementation,
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> so there was no agreement or contract needed.

What is that something that happened? and to which HTTP/2 implementation?

  - Dmitri.