Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-quic-ts-04.txt

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D033A115D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:33:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yaIQJtnkbw39 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127203A0C5B for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id h16so711031qth.11 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:33:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CIs2timJ0A3VzKD8xZ+HiJUugLv7mWsA8ojtFueezLE=; b=ENTlMSTQeMQLJ7XF1yAUBVLahDG1QO5lODyqccEGye45mQyY/f4JhCXeE4smM/dCeW ZozxQypRGezwt/+iCFLqpTt43+vEdqqDavxgdJ0SHyU3G92O2nMoDFBAZHZf3U7dmMBM rnruZ41+gdMAuTGRuzUDi7M1vp63gSQnUuPObScvZtooW2Qc31zKlmYCFbTIuGTsGVqj yuAGnlix+qyhaEIF9pADxBnbo2zp47M4sWKeUrtyFd9d8hQUJuLtgrmrkYSILcyG86rA t5Ir/1fJq+8v2fY2aqd8IZa4S5IcKWnNtF9v4FScgY+4tmX+VzhH+lNRn+O8zKqmYro0 c7rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CIs2timJ0A3VzKD8xZ+HiJUugLv7mWsA8ojtFueezLE=; b=SnSnrSMP8C8V368F8/43g/rXkp8qHZkSwCtxjD1zYKQ4CuhTNr2cN3QI/EGmQysjgh AzcmI3RO9nowoAQLMAPXKb4U3//xF0HJcghbu6Ii97hN2xJvbiP6oUrHVMrO6uOSBGr9 0GShNMFTmVUFTExy6rUS+swFk7O7WjPGpT9ZcZjgptzbmOGGpawP38oqFA2me+1q4ysH +leFAq4A1R8qLCkgxx+7JxU51JwaLECuSwJwzY7oux4KKfCeM3zrMIj1dLYlBfY9SqTQ 19sBD8fuNo3dgIqGQ3SrEQ6JrG78koomvrPYva+4ww8OldWr+Kmk0bNfhSNMu8C2aEsO i4rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304l1tl3EGUyZ7seql4nk0qFD+LC18qFlFXhhoTTBN7XNg1svB9 drPgAiC7sROEbx+rXk38SLDqDE2vlPPPMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2IPvfyySawjD+9y9fdJeASs/kUx9PBeJKGBZuKQ3bRJfrDlwgkTrOtChvR3eByXgDNcJ1uw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:59cb:: with SMTP id f11mr4127607qtf.70.1612384392671; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from okhta (ool-44c1d219.dyn.optonline.net. [68.193.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u133sm2843651qka.116.2021.02.03.12.33.11 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:33:09 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-quic-ts-04.txt
Message-ID: <20210203203309.GD801221@okhta>
Mail-Followup-To: quic@ietf.org
References: <161223163185.8315.16919282678085125127@ietfa.amsl.com> <04f368f2-d9e4-dec4-5262-e1f56f2654ed@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <04f368f2-d9e4-dec4-5262-e1f56f2654ed@huitema.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/rufetwjKBewEEm7ZA8WIdofnIaw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:33:15 -0000

I vote "yes"

  - Dmitri.

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 06:12:36PM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
> New version of the Time Stamp draft. I have been using Time Stamps in
> Picoquic for some time, in particular in my implementation of HyStart,
> because measuring one way delays avoid "early exit from HyStart" errors due
> to transient queues on the return path. Time Stamps are also very useful
> when managing data recovery for multipath, as explained in https://huitema.wordpress.com/2021/01/27/estimating-round-trip-and-one-way-delays-in-multipath-quic-sessions/.
> 
> Is the working group ready to consider adopting this draft?
> 
> -- Christian Huitema