IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Invariants

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061D812D7F3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:54:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fja_hgy5KfhA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49F9412D7EC for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v196so1472241ywc.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Kln2TnWxkIX7Qldl8eu/p2FjUEBqj3bkqNqAvXR484k=; b=aRxobFcQq972UWs/3AP7MJB45QoG9PePMzsstbZKRf9Dz7F1xiJP29YSpY2TF781tX TfVrasfwxMX7cERhBEl65FsF3NHTVlW0TEsQXlP933jLLzonLotNPSdjVVxIbDmX3UJT trYphDHos06yBQcpxTOnWITAGg+trat4UD8kLjIF2SQHmofux3apIVJHZmyt/qxcRxmy OQxqNzjRl9MG0uBgzMe6vcvFd5VPtVYOAGVxw7xodIDuE7/rLcAODY/CSV48KwsAKH55 hmj24d6AivnmvSGFnisz4udUf6gdOqkIVUP0CzDhsMkfUjf0b3ZokXCxXawN8XUlzNNy f5vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kln2TnWxkIX7Qldl8eu/p2FjUEBqj3bkqNqAvXR484k=; b=nD/QIrTySdOlgZitmJX3AF0VB7UA86T2ewTSIegtp0k2/lTKqo3h/gTvNnr53aeDzx W1aN3bn4bCijcvqWB2mZ5XRSIi7wwietx/20MwV/z3yXjqfMUurlpPFX6g91rFSWngH6 KXrGpesFDma3uTNBV/y2YWJjcgMvvRCa/miDIAqa4i8E85SBuwTGVKH+r/q5/TLhGrHw bJwMQuy0tXww2weMR2HB3iyv/BH9M/tcmN0DcD4X5bnA5oKVu4eEtL3V/nYKdBemUgRB dQ57PpODFHqFpPvnQKpOwqJv+BPi4c7tSO+C+5PxTNCMZoznYImnqkQdC95YTOx/WzQe 8+xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDpKcvZknytwEJNXaYVGmbEU8i6nZzb5andfJW06UN1FlqUYDj9 vMXX+Xutw8K2pzl08+a6HtPpqfHHsHgcQcvfQhk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226Jt5oU9D9F0qESgb38m66/2mPMidEV+M3Oul0OC8qAs/OA46NCh+sI8BPmzzpsSdmJK+vpAcc2awRmXIMrvJQ=
X-Received: by 10.129.87.2 with SMTP id l2mr1543394ywb.454.1517928892169; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 06:54:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.21.201 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 06:54:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR08MB2432F1CB1FBAFACD611D3913DAFE0@MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <C35C3AB6-F0FC-4D83-9C97-DD0B605A863F@mnot.net> <DB6PR10MB17667AAB19D4A9288FD5BAF3ACFE0@DB6PR10MB1766.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <FDFA0988-1FB4-4AFC-8958-1A6B16068FE5@trammell.ch> <MWHPR08MB2432F1CB1FBAFACD611D3913DAFE0@MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 08:54:51 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cJs8Ms62tBjxGTXBZ6GeD0+VgdWzG7zYf8Yui=a4HPvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Invariants
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a3c4e6982e605648c5c50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/sQuFciWi2IZd_C6eBxV24D-gIrc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 14:54:55 -0000

Asking with no hat, but ...

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:

> I support adoption.  The way to change the invariants will be to mint a
> new protocol, and not claim that your new protocol is a version of QUIC.
> If it happens to be startlingly similar, all well and good.


If you roll a new protocol, that's not a version of QUIC, is it obvious to
everyone but me whether you can run both protocols on UDP/443?

I thought I remembered that UDP/443 was chosen because firewalls often pass
port 443, so that aids deployment. Hence, my question.

Thanks,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email