IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Testing the proposed PRs in a timely fashion

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 27 February 2018 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3912E05C for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:57:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VRLLrHZyv3kb for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF23912E045 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id m5so341055wrg.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t0JsPNQzWG6BkjciHvglL4w5oI7PjMKafqEJooXtaAA=; b=iYYkG3WJv15jA25uhpE7DJgtKRkwnUIiORuz++5NgLn0kofrn8l47WTsS6sWvQ/SzO c1tRgWNqYXKqAIAcAeWB5YvFrrse8McSMBDUg1myzbvJvJ7QwaTKJI6IWERfGVx2oiZU 3OCR1yKInMzXszz6L65NfBECoyXYOU+msdAwILbRZq+LCE1QhZ46O7zWXn4mqCD7P9jI VTTnv5RZgDG8nMo8ze92xmFLTDtRmiM1yuxnHFGrEQkQziBrG+FdTIA848u/KKqA50xq QucB++wQFq9Dez9SiLywhmHAxyW7bCen7wmoTfEPGmmjdSbhZANG51hlJ3bpQgrmjrwO 56uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t0JsPNQzWG6BkjciHvglL4w5oI7PjMKafqEJooXtaAA=; b=X5kwAdop7kiF3/OvLyfqklPzImF2LWNXByQrd4/DG5+z6EG9wtYVshB9wDzE1kpHIs 9BdVPaZcgcHHJF4RWaWVjMxSxhliM5DJ7xzVxn2wztPkQrasmURwHV51XBokVLkfn72w Jipd15EDdVlxrmQe6FX3DUA+U8Hi9bHO6oByWdhGmxmKZM21NKHmU6/ddf1MVNamw78d 62QNSZI3cMNMcbvSIYkrsBgfitvzmVm3WrXg9JyPfYYDBnGDv2A/U76egrHEHDK3Hiy2 1rB++ENoz179biPHEvj4KL0Fpj400QPVARGyC4qOmzM4TqGwq1jGVtmTSYdyVmL7+wiG ftbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB1NpqUSydBet3Gn84ufJkmHkNJ6969Vv3QeO0A6rOb/fWYIHVs ZCWBBKrhRyfG+R+atJBCohR/DQvaMSMrXDMo7whSFQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225+xNc1o0R7q727SSKy/kVkZasf2mZMnzkkhBA0oKnWezCkKqzLjazmrYU4PBgiuw29daT+9zlDZ1ph8rgFOWU=
X-Received: by 10.223.163.85 with SMTP id d21mr13886196wrb.105.1519768609486; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:56:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.195.139 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:56:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXT9yaC46qjMhFFo_GPPdzPxz5X_u+v8aRW_qfwHWfhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a152835b-9309-ff10-cc97-0481cff2cb56@huitema.net> <CABkgnnVpN+iWQbjNkswv40FvwHR14K_fSXioSAd=7Wtyd2T=SA@mail.gmail.com> <d172e3b2-c9f6-81ce-a346-9811ce79c9b1@huitema.net> <CABkgnnXT9yaC46qjMhFFo_GPPdzPxz5X_u+v8aRW_qfwHWfhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:56:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDccFwePHMa2B9e4e2m3F2rMeiOpqr28UhTxiWheW5Ug+1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Testing the proposed PRs in a timely fashion
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f14e81bfc35056638b4c6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/sRdN1t9qoNKec4SfPFFZ3J5r7wI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:57:10 -0000

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
> wrote:
> > Cool. Do you think we could have that spec merged before the London
> > meeting? Or should we start preparing for interop days in April and May?
>
> I hope so.  That depends a little on Jana though.  I've been holding
> -10 for it, because it seems like a good thing to put into something
> more concrete.
>

I've been in a bit of a lull the past week, but climbing out of it now. I
am hoping to address comments on the PR today, and I think there's enough
momentum in the wg to get it to merge soon. That said ...


I would prepare for more interop days no matter what.  I'm not yet
> confident that we're at the point of people deploying code and until
> that happens, these events are what we've got.
>

... I agree with this. We have a number of moving pieces, and -10 isn't the
end of it. The more interops we have, the faster we move towards spec
maturity, which we sorely need.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email