arguments for Edge
Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de> Sun, 27 June 2021 09:15 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron.ding@tum.de>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D4C3A2226 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 02:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3GMPszvELPa for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out2.in.tum.de [131.159.0.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D533A2225 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (mailrelay1.in.tum.de [131.159.254.14]) by mail-out2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0A12400B1; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6CED7DDF; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE11DDD; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vmrbg463.in.tum.de (webmail.in.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0::91]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D27EDDB; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from webmail.in.tum.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by vmrbg463.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1955B10000A; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:15:30 +0200
From: Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: arguments for Edge
In-Reply-To: <5907c434e2919aba66d5f4729f39571f@tum.de>
References: <5907c434e2919aba66d5f4729f39571f@tum.de>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11
Message-ID: <3dbaa780606f9b0aa4bdffd01fc9287f@tum.de>
X-Sender: aaron.ding@tum.de
Organization: TU Munich
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/soXI8DqQtxfoA8aJarcse9Qv4hM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:15:37 -0000
Is the motive for Edge (i.e., latency) diminishing since its first concepts were formulated more than a decade ago? A recent work to share on "Revisiting the Arguments for Edge Computing Research": https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.12224.pdf Aaron
- ACM SIGCOMM HotNets'21 DL in 30 days Aaron Ding
- Re: arguments for Edge Phillip Hallam-Baker
- arguments for Edge Aaron Ding
- Re: arguments for Edge Dave Taht
- Re: arguments for Edge Aaron Ding
- Re: arguments for Edge Phillip Hallam-Baker