Re: Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 13 January 2021 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6253A11BE; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQdKu_4oHI4r; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF3E3A11BC; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id d9so5420521iob.6; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dtzk6HuW4PHAMrkt5N0FBEtVuRIG+1WVuZGToUvjo/4=; b=dPznVC8orM+/dnlTLd782Q7F82sEJ8PhkkBHAMM0s4gMQYlCLNBXwAbXTNG2tJ5Yle fFVtbWaevzUSteH7PR+Mswf/AxBgMQYKiq0fm3hAPwKYMXxT+domxxEcFdLJx5E3lJ9J Rk2hCFZh77yTO6sLdFRcuRJMIFhoQymIOOSSE8FTMWTHZ9TX67WxYw/e197A4/qcc7uN 3u0tlwsHGX91s9UbPkArY3R0SO5/1bDJ5pz9H/r5j5UKkzv69PwBF7eqg91XLBTQyRpq NdB+xfbFCWt0VfgsU+U2dNQ5LhKwQshCXgmY/VzCI4oCWM8kIgJ4XA/yMYZyqxvWeSiD v1tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dtzk6HuW4PHAMrkt5N0FBEtVuRIG+1WVuZGToUvjo/4=; b=pvK+lTiFJUPXle2H/z+MeFbDt9BCjHMkx7aYCMF2ywldNiibcooZmJ76Ay0agYr+F0 Oa3ligkoWKW3RbHrOKOuHcMcKm0Cb3qP39K/0q2qhaS7lscZeBza5tVjYSSCOcCS9pSg +ipPPotaAx78u6mHZFVLdJ1e2ESNCKu5ppRaZncOVWxVKHDvoO4wM667pXBHa1q7M1CZ ht4U+Jiud02rV3ho05gG6E1XyGaJd1qceuxE6/UhbVgrYYLPmyov1ACBluxEm2aFYs6v MC2kTvcnjzIrHm1AQLoedNFmuWsxgGdEd1zllEev4IkUjEobkzStq4eKp0Y9NOsCFJL0 yAmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532homVmWackFJ6LItr3vcX5yWAou0JXJZpLPHLEip8MGP8yU1Jh /KjMRUySqGnA2tzjLKtud5zz5INtWDUcetRaJs0LSBINPQI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyypvhxmD1BN5IXjl2R1mclcS+TSLJXoT5NXeXWjXEYtvH4qEj2m0rLncUEPieXlqCp1rOR1OPSoKxOanEhTF8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce8f:: with SMTP id r15mr2119802ilo.303.1610556370860; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C3E1321A-D279-4C48-994A-44D7365EADF8@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <C3E1321A-D279-4C48-994A-44D7365EADF8@eggert.org>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:46:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRfoYOa_WGGLZV_djGitnZtvCnUW9sY+QhbcUKdwRCwZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000603f4f05b8cae03d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ud9B8QtGuSmd9lAC5mRiwEfbjTo>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:46:14 -0000

The resolution to my issue is satisfactory.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:32 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> in response to the IESG Review of the QUIC transport, tls, recovery and
> invariants documents, individual GitHub issues were opened and the
> documents moved to the "Revised I-D Needed" state. (The HTTP/3 and QPACK
> IESG reviews will happen at a later date.)
>
> The editors have been hard at work triaging and responding to the issues.
> Thanks to a concerted effort, most of the issues have already been
> resolved. Some were deemed to require no action and have been closed, some
> were Editorial issues that have been addressed by PRs that have been merged
> into the working copies. The remaining issues have been identified as
> Design issues, see
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Adesign+-label%3Acall-issued
>
> As previously mentioned, we are boosting the visibility of these Design
> issues in order to allow the WG and the IESG to comment on the proposed
> resolutions:
>
> * Martin Duke Transport Comment 2 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4453
>   The proposed resolution is
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4696
>
> * Robert Wilton Invariants Discuss 1 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4468
>   The proposed resolution is to close with no action.
>
> * Ben Kaduk's TLS Discuss 1 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4475
>   The proposed resolution is
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4689
>
> * Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 9 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4485
>   The proposed resolution is
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4570#
>
> * Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 2 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4525
>   The proposed resolution is to close with no action.
>
> * Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 4 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4527
>   The proposed resolution is to close with no action.
>
> * Éric Vyncke's Transport Comment 13 -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4536
>   The proposed resolution is
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4471
>
> The editors are ready to land the proposed resolutions and release version
> -34 of transport, tls, recovery and invariants documents so that we can
> present them back to the IESG so that the remaining DISCUSSes can be
> formally lifted.
>
> Rather than issuing a WG consensus call for the above design issues, we
> plan to action the proposed resolutions, mark the issues as "call-issued"
> and leave them open until the IESG confirms that it is happy, in order for
> further comments to accumulate.
>
> Cheers
> Lars & Lucas
> QUIC WG Co-chairs
>