Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 14 March 2021 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D93B3A1D56 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.819
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.819 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=prngCNW4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=plcOlPHO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwLFV_S_LuYc for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3FAF3A1D53 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7595417BF for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=/y1mW/zWIxygMNKNIWtne6/Jj9j8yJjplZej+iCIKlA=; b=prngCNW4 9w5kYZXHnla2pydsT4nl4V3dhFADEBx27WfQQw2j8tmJ7zJ8sNeCAxXQaQrb27Av aghwHiPjkJZKyyxsZtWaLzJdLr1CcY5csDJ2+3HvmQas8OXwcD2C/AQYTs+dcOy2 5TXXdfuejh/MLGsnupVgLegyMvYGpcRvWQKFO9OUQhmz8RKaXh9rKVNk2vZJJ704 sbpRwQyyCu6VFBK+B0ZFe6GK/kFp+nh3dCW7oq2+2OgU/5EHq6y2U82TUz4lXRE4 tyEe2hnpJWg4cTY3dNAa5kHn7EbYRPOCaIC6qUiZkW6VvCpygiqzmrs5Ucd5fHLq 7PQAo2yfxm+92w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=/y1mW/zWIxygMNKNIWtne6/Jj9j8y JjplZej+iCIKlA=; b=plcOlPHOPsGtUlDB6K58hhBwmor324Lzw3CXUuBP1+V/J PBfGc/9iaVq0ksMMFtOsrXKnAP96lM0p4j1ThMyHNOBTDCD53su3umUZK8ybOAVM lEd/7TY6AxSGv4gO1nfMyw+c0543pZajJu2uFmwZx/w2shs2qCUBs8xedpDE7kLE HCylBopzNPkAnL84AQRMopxD6hy5Oa2l8hVe0GADHX1ydxJcpYGanKL5Zulm0wto lmaygyniKVtMcKBcmXyUewqbk6pOeLduQP3KM765LFfgKexQkCqX4ytpW5EUbL2d 92VOb/1KOCmodchR2ZLZsImdHUdBsUEV72xAkFwfw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:d71NYOMtJpd4GQzLkHBiPItaIsJjBojldDS0g4XTJ9Fx7jXK5rufXQ> <xme:d71NYM-XtRfQBC3_t3dt-qjf7w1AfFr61L9jSACpG-Eub2bAcT_9e_EiIoYKQfuCw 98z0GKFyrjV1Y0j_g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvhedgkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepvdefrddutddurddugeehrd dujedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:d71NYFT16aobSiltzGGujfZz1C17WzA9Azkn3WfbgIuuRRvsgSdL5w> <xmx:d71NYOtYWj6yy0gAnN_sB7g2rglLkS2RiLpuRGZJNTSoVoovE996gQ> <xmx:d71NYGfCQrdR3bd7_6-nVW4fSX1l_oUD8XQih4uNxbUJTUQmKMdLfw> <xmx:eL1NYKF2LREm0z0pFqUISBDMhsK_SDEg-kDyjallOuPrCjNvGcXCMg>
Received: from fv-az207-156.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [23.101.145.171]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4BD2D240057 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============9052445828854614795=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20210314073831.4BD2D240057@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:31 -0400
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/umFpscU-CXhFAcIPNlBzQojsF0g>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:38:36 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-0/💬15)
4 issues created:
- Revert Spurious Congestion Event (by nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4836
- clarify how to handle in increase in initial_max_{stream_}data_{uni, bidi} (by marten-seemann)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4834
- Recovery: Initialization of min_rtt when used with Cubic (by WesleyRosenblum)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4833
- Incorrect reference to stream state section from frame description (by tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4832
3 issues received 15 new comments:
- #4836 Revert Spurious Congestion Event (7 by LPardue, huitema, junhochoi, nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4836 [-recovery]
- #4834 clarify how to handle in increase in initial_max_{stream_}data_{uni, bidi} (3 by kazuho, marten-seemann, martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4834 [-transport]
- #4833 Recovery: Initialization of min_rtt when used with Cubic (5 by LPardue, WesleyRosenblum, ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4833
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-0/💬5)
3 issues created:
- draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback 4.5 (by jaredmauch)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/290
- draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback (by jaredmauch)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/289
- Make it more clear that streams are not ordered (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/286 [-applicability]
3 issues received 5 new comments:
- #242 Section 4.8.2.: Forcing address stability (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/242 [-manageability] [NAT section] [has PR]
- #197 App: What does "prime a CC" mean? (3 by martinduke, martinthomson, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/197 [-applicability] [meeting-agenda]
- #178 Sect 2.7: Telling middleboxes to ignore version? (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/178 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
* quicwg/datagram (+0/-0/💬21)
5 issues received 21 new comments:
- #15 Exposing datagram acknowledgements (11 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, huitema, nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/15
- #8 Text on Datagram's Interaction with Loss Recovery is a bit Light (1 by janaiyengar)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/8
- #6 No streams in datagrams? (3 by LPardue, ekinnear, skissane)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/6
- #3 Specify Max Payload Size instead of Max Frame Size (5 by DavidSchinazi, huitema, martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/3
- #2 Consider retransmission bit leakage (1 by martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/2
* quicwg/load-balancers (+3/-1/💬3)
3 issues created:
- Reduce load of Dynamic SID allocation (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/101
- Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
- Consider an alternative name to 'non-compliant' (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/98
3 issues received 3 new comments:
- #101 Reduce load of Dynamic SID allocation (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/101
- #99 Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
- #98 Consider an alternative name to 'non-compliant' (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/98
1 issues closed:
- Retry service handling of non-Initial https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/96
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+1/-0/💬1)
1 issues created:
- Terminological precision (by wbl)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/32
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #32 Terminological precision (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/32
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-0/💬7)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Rewrite sentence about probes to prime cc (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/291
- Connections aren't reset, they are closed. (by mjoras)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/288
- Reword TFO/0-rtt sentence. (by mjoras)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/287
6 pull requests received 7 new comments:
- #287 Reword TFO/0-rtt sentence. (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/287
- #279 Remove line about use of 0xff (2 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/279 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
- #272 Rewrite NAT section to minimum text (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/272 [-manageability] [next revision] [ready-to-merge]
- #257 rewrite NAT section (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/257 [-manageability] [next revision]
- #256 Recommendation for NATs and consequences of using CID (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/256 [-manageability] [next revision]
- #233 Recommendation on ACKing (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/233 [-applicability] [meeting-agenda]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-1/💬4)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Changing wording about server/service synchronization (by fiestajetsam)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/100
1 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #100 Changing wording about server/service synchronization (4 by martinduke, wbl)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/100
1 pull requests merged:
- Clarify Retry Service handling of non-Initial Packets
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/97
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot