Re: Consensus Calls for Late Stage Documents

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:31 PM Ian Swett <ianswett=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks for the call, all these resolutions look great to me, but I think
> the PR is incorrect for the two Retry issues.
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:57 PM Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Happy New Year, Working Group.
>>
>> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
>> seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on
>> the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject
>> appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to
>> incorporate them late next week.
>>
>> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
>> state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <
>> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
>>
>> * #3274: Encrypting Retry token
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
>>
> I believe the proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120
>

I added some editorial comments here but I can live with the substantive
outcome,

The rest of these look fine.

-Ekr


>> * #3247: I am concerned the congestion control text is too permissive.
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
>>
>> * #3245: Make RFC 6928 normative
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3287>
>>
>> * #3244: Can we make a normative ref to  RFC8085?
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
>>
>> * #3243: Add caution when using IW10 and fragmentation
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3280>
>>
>> * #3152: Client storage of tokens should be independent of other stored
>> state
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150>
>>
>> * #3142: It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during /
>> after migration
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
>>
>> * #3094: congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in
>> bursty sends
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3232>
>>
>> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
>>
> Also https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120
>
>>
>> * #2863: unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
>>
>> * #2789: Use a higher seed RTT for new paths
>>    The proposal is to close with no action.
>>
>> * #2744: Idle Timer Can Fire Even with Outstanding Data to Send
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266>
>>
>> * #2602: Idle timeout needs more description and a recommendation
>>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3099>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>