IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comparing HTTP over QUIC header compression schemes

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Tue, 06 June 2017 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4291412426E for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHmO_hlOCQPO for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virgo01.ee.ethz.ch (virgo01.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CD2124217 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virgo01.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3whmH82Q6ZzMl4X; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:15:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at virgo01.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from virgo01.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virgo01.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IA-n_4syIZbI; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:14:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-MtScore: NO score=0
Received: from [10.243.37.8] (unknown [89.202.203.52]) by virgo01.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:14:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Comparing HTTP over QUIC header compression schemes
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU5Ar37eT83y5UXb-72r5qkUGpO164zKUM_1WuRv3vLvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:14:59 +0200
Cc: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Alan Frindell <afrind@fb.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A169408-892A-4E56-B171-E2F0F1731097@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <7241DB81-B9AD-44B6-9B03-902A8890F672@fb.com> <6C24B412-CB20-4DA4-9300-A1CA67CBC2A2@netapp.com> <CABkgnnU5Ar37eT83y5UXb-72r5qkUGpO164zKUM_1WuRv3vLvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/x2xLpsqoJPTyByzvhqd861_10bY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 09:15:04 -0000

> Am 06.06.2017 um 11:10 schrieb Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>:
> 
> On 6 June 2017 at 10:59, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
>> (2) simulating loss rates much above 1% is likely going to be pretty uninteresting, given that QUIC (and TCP, FWIW) have congestion controllers that will struggle to even deliver useful throughputs in these cases
> 
> 
> That's an interesting point.  I've seen a presentation (that I can't
> find now, but I can try) that shows that packet loss in real-world
> scenarios approaches 2% in a great many cases.
> 

With TCP traffic or a traffic aggregate that includes TCP traffic?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email