Re: Call for Adoption: draft-duke-quic-load-balancers

Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com> Sat, 14 December 2019 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <martenseemann@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7026120142 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:02:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AL1Lp9od_7D2 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABA8120005 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id i23so710703lfo.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:02:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EG3P6qUueoinQnhg9o0opfea58kxGYZknTEPQB2g0Yc=; b=OSgUp+musifB79RpMH9xuNwSt80zjXQaVJSQaTXtIBL9kzUPtZvIBOI6j+I8RGhvKp LJKOhhcD8WwdtRiqLSQpRomPgLTVc168adR6Qdz+SVfXTF7JOQ0niIYenu/UHsvusteh 7nkpp8bkfYVUBFG802KxzleKpX+sgcm0/Af+RDKf3R6fdJRfmOQbZpB9u7CHLRNHikFg yHbPmvjL38WIbp1iC4b6oU9BUvoGTZuLor9MkxBsrnK8V5FASag4uNl7uE0iHCE631Tu OUUnP7o2taHTb37b7E3v6pY+DDJZ1VkZslMIcxJGueDxzkF/SMxvekuf7Dm15YQnG5Ut /Jrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EG3P6qUueoinQnhg9o0opfea58kxGYZknTEPQB2g0Yc=; b=cfzjXcalAj5XrTWAUpUsNM0zCWhXZ0Yb53smHRH2GEGf/hcbNLwC2yU3unOts/0/JG fPtO8sHe2QyD+8kPZKb7hquLqJwzZnSXCCNT97iZN0iCwLihF/Ynferd3J9fwrNH8331 5aFqnjHQLhF2YBcsIk5z5vvFpOySIO+bh86zn5B7cm3C9K26ScrbgnvkuDAT7yaopZIZ wtco124G3CDT7quT4JixIoL1I/YkTBfxhwxEm/amQhsE7cdf6sLh3UJtqhlNcUX9gC79 8v1+Q/vaEmEHo9b4vhYt2cqp1f5gdrh0Hny6sDqXFWlHfyByreqGGJCVeK9oH0JFtuL+ DDNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUXNTfW7EEP/DSxbtpbfXvAOVKoJdr7sGn8CISsMiyrLIF3EhxE km+Z9hWEklgv0Y5R0NPTLFuh1Xal/8ex2QQDurc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxm4fn+pc9A0TMW/UzOd8eFhzaVm64jeOlM0fXzU3r8lvNEu9NozqgmGD5u9KLMNGS+/oJ2fZQZEOAhuFqKP20=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5623:: with SMTP id b3mr10994219lff.10.1576296174369; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:02:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B30B3746-B033-48F0-808E-335FD282BE42@mnot.net> <ea5e1618-4ca5-4648-80c9-a9e9c60bd142@www.fastmail.com> <CANatvzzx-9okLq8=UrUrj82+Vp9v9V5m-996=cwydOBaBxsvQA@mail.gmail.com> <1A460098-14EC-426C-B9C6-291E2270DFC3@apple.com> <924748BE-9A65-43F9-B316-6EF9E10CA05E@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <924748BE-9A65-43F9-B316-6EF9E10CA05E@apple.com>
From: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 08:02:43 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOYVs2rVDEbQpUQMCWEAhKdkKFXwvwfo4TyimZgaQae3GaaGsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-duke-quic-load-balancers
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088c2750599a20d84"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/yGHjBWtNwF6ZwT5pEfstR7u5xVo>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 04:02:59 -0000

+1 for adoption.

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 03:36 Rui Paulo <rpaulo=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> I would also like to see it adopted by the WG.
>
> > On Dec 13, 2019, at 14:43, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Let's adopt this document! We should focus mainly on the advice for how
> to do load balancing, more than the protocol details. It would be great to
> split those out soon.
> >
> > Best,
> > Tommy
> >
> >> On Dec 11, 2019, at 5:12 PM, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2019年12月12日(木) 9:58 Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>et>:
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019, at 08:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >> > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document:
> >> >   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-06
> >>
> >> My recollection was that the model that this describes was desirable,
> but not so much the protocol.  I recall there being a request to move the
> protocol pieces out and concentrate on the model.  That hasn't happened.
> >>
> >> That said, this is fine work and as QUIC depends greatly on closer
> cooperation between load balancers and servers we'd be doing server
> operators a disservice if we didn't adopt this.
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 to what MT says (including support for adoption).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kazuho Oku
> >
>
> —
> Rui Paulo
>
>