Re: -http and -qpack - Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

Thanks,

If anyone have issues with these changes please raise them prior to 17th of
February. I intended to approve the documents then if no issues have been
raised.

Cheers

Magnus


On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 00:32 +0000, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In response to the IESG Review of the QUIC WG -http and -qpack documents,
> individual GitHub issues were opened and the documents moved to the "Revised
> I-D Needed" state.
> 
> The editors have been hard at work triaging and responding to the issues.
> Thanks to a concerted effort, most of the issues have already been resolved.
> Some were deemed to require no action and have been closed, some were
> Editorial issues that have been addressed by PRs that have been merged into
> the working copies. The remaining issues have been identified as Design
> issues, see 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acall-issued+label%3A-http
>  and 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acall-issued+label%3A-qpack
> 
> In line with how we handled resolving the last set of IESG design issues,
> rather than issue a WG consensus call, the editors have published new drafts
> -http-34 and -qpack-21. These address the Design issues listed below by
> incorporating the associated proposed resolutions. This email serves to boost
> the visibility of these Design issues, now marked with a "call-issued" label,
> in order to allow the WG and the IESG to comment on the proposed resolutions.
> Note however that at this late stage, if the WG push back against issues
> discussed between editors, ADs and IESG members, we risk invalidating the
> review and needing to start over.
> 
> * HTTP/3 authority diverged from SEMANTICS - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4761
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
>   
> * Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 1 - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4763
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
>   
> * Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 2 - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4764
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
>   
> * Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (aka Ben's HTTP/3 Discuss 1) -
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
>   
> * Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Discuss 2 - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4775
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
>   
> * Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779
>   The proposed resolution is close with no design change but make the
> editorial improvement https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4819
>   
> * Defer to core HTTP for 421 status code - 
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4790
>   The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808
> 
> Cheers
> Lars, Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Co-chairs