Re: Testing the proposed PRs in a timely fashion

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 27 February 2018 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC1A12D94D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9LY_0z6u3SNS for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22f.google.com (mail-ot0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5756C1201F8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w38so2174182ota.8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FQcF4GokBEeQvGDg8MwQiM897zH4Y90g+0K90A5YecI=; b=G57xKM6+rHEJQkdws//Ae8C5RqvaN0Hj9jfUD1lzUAIuH6umdjjL32XuAcjBsMZgwd vgBEM2cn5W/bDCogblUdj0g3nzfmTH+O0ZRG2+uwkG86eI7xu8AvyH0U00PdLbz9HCxD HO930ka4hS5mU9QJQDBzSuA0Xa0wOJ4ru3aE00sPHq3D3WHYGYUfzN0k7j7IPUlQMvXn mQAbDSRwOG4GffFzB/pi0iXolry4nOiehTewja3LaEMgoDj5Q0Kbl0fUwOf+EjtJXtbE UMjHCqyIs2ElXaI4nqOb97dMXkTGDqI/YJ2GAn1dWSXo4fgo2Z/Mauw2NaQoS3lvvrVC stSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FQcF4GokBEeQvGDg8MwQiM897zH4Y90g+0K90A5YecI=; b=ASHYpjZxl/E9B+vydJ9gwdnMLzqZAXDSiA7/4gz+73u80yYlfkChZu+v+t9NnqmKN7 Ce1IidnypSkQkybRwq7iE9GDG7I8/80RPFACVDB/NW8HiXgwQ/XW9b6u6ALrVR+ais4n iVdjKLwnPvu223ilJBzlZwDZzESqXdPMVq9fpF8lKq53WwhZgtc2zQTsrJuiNaLpVjvY H06pAx8TBKOEfTpqZpeWWgX/B+olPYezwtZv/p33sM8i0+Uo4W+Y7sTdV/Y7Ly4K9rqw REFRGVSGAZq2WhmpS/V3eV9Su8c/vPmUsjLRjhEHsHnEbdCMmHbEFm0Tcl1ooayhZQRJ PC7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDorlicMaxG/PZK/L6zKZ/w2p1rgSUlg3M7p89reUl12r9HhW6z 0Obr17NIVAWKzzoISX8K5l+la5yEYtMZM6lptYU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsDHv1on9IBcWFjj/ScRJZvBHGOO6ILLszSci7zutIjhd0fsS+wPuXSvJzBgQREM1lhVTsvWw5Jncly7stJxic=
X-Received: by 10.157.64.181 with SMTP id n50mr9330889ote.241.1519689926364; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.85 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:05:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d172e3b2-c9f6-81ce-a346-9811ce79c9b1@huitema.net>
References: <a152835b-9309-ff10-cc97-0481cff2cb56@huitema.net> <CABkgnnVpN+iWQbjNkswv40FvwHR14K_fSXioSAd=7Wtyd2T=SA@mail.gmail.com> <d172e3b2-c9f6-81ce-a346-9811ce79c9b1@huitema.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:05:25 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXT9yaC46qjMhFFo_GPPdzPxz5X_u+v8aRW_qfwHWfhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Testing the proposed PRs in a timely fashion
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/yiT-a2ocEDaNbXdbXp0XZScwvJM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:05:29 -0000

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> Cool. Do you think we could have that spec merged before the London
> meeting? Or should we start preparing for interop days in April and May?

I hope so.  That depends a little on Jana though.  I've been holding
-10 for it, because it seems like a good thing to put into something
more concrete.

I would prepare for more interop days no matter what.  I'm not yet
confident that we're at the point of people deploying code and until
that happens, these events are what we've got.