IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Connection IDs

Subodh Iyengar <subodh@fb.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <subodh@fb.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A79127735 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:56:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1520538960; bh=R4/BJAy/r2g0I9tA21frD9HFPcDNVqvIIBRnYuPo+B4=; h=From:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To; b=bjuA2u9mjwY12BjKg0ViaiNaspoxiiTVCZqwzHW8hG2i8nhHiCTw4Fk3AwQoJLYIy 05sOZ/P4hVBfneiZctbYrKZAhtZ1EPEeGkoF7hvYamqnh6BWgmsq++SlEjixPgvMPr R7Sn0ni18rJTM/uvu+VF9T/i10rlhQ2DlQwFGxrU=
X-Mailbox-Line: From subodh@fb.com Thu Mar 8 11:56:00 2018
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC6612762F; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:56:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1520538960; bh=R4/BJAy/r2g0I9tA21frD9HFPcDNVqvIIBRnYuPo+B4=; h=From:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To; b=bjuA2u9mjwY12BjKg0ViaiNaspoxiiTVCZqwzHW8hG2i8nhHiCTw4Fk3AwQoJLYIy 05sOZ/P4hVBfneiZctbYrKZAhtZ1EPEeGkoF7hvYamqnh6BWgmsq++SlEjixPgvMPr R7Sn0ni18rJTM/uvu+VF9T/i10rlhQ2DlQwFGxrU=
X-Original-To: dmarc-reverse@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc-reverse@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009DA1250B8 for <dmarc-reverse@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fb.com header.b=FNiDaR+k; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fb.onmicrosoft.com header.b=UR6jc78s
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0TaErgK3IISI for <dmarc-reverse@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D1412762F for <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0109332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w28JsJwC019595; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:55:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=facebook; bh=R4/BJAy/r2g0I9tA21frD9HFPcDNVqvIIBRnYuPo+B4=; b=FNiDaR+kfC/V3j2r9uOj6GBtwlOdamz/WbV2t6JzL4FBF325j21F5snAz99K/iO1bUeC ZnZiN11DdMPX4u0nCuYeJX76ykhkr/LRQ/0f7dLIttK18bK7RjDJZyNHRcZIO6ufYT0d ++NnviFJ/ViLvU6Ofh+kBZ7gS0aA45Q5O7Y=
Received: from maileast.thefacebook.com ([199.201.65.23]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gk9q68eaw-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:55:56 -0800
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (192.168.183.28) by o365-in.thefacebook.com (192.168.177.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:55:54 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fb-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=R4/BJAy/r2g0I9tA21frD9HFPcDNVqvIIBRnYuPo+B4=; b=UR6jc78sHEpDtJmQOoTZBSAefhWkp1qCsITFakhHB4txnAF5ijB4yWAau5Axq4rHbrqraiHDDS1chGk6kT9Jfp3WYb5Kdogzj+N7HzNLG0BfaI6aXz8HQn9Qz8IR1VjNXAL0wIVxAdKV/mk+7Xjo9qn+jfEEQ8sQw2Z48Q9WFIg=
Received: from MWHPR15MB1821.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.174.255.137) by MWHPR15MB1280.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.175.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.548.13; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 19:55:52 +0000
Received: from MWHPR15MB1821.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b431:b2fb:1912:34d8]) by MWHPR15MB1821.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b431:b2fb:1912:34d8%17]) with mapi id 15.20.0567.012; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 19:55:52 +0000
From: Subodh Iyengar <subodh@fb.com>
CC: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>
Subject: Re: Connection IDs
Thread-Topic: Connection IDs
Thread-Index: AQHTtCT3CCZvsz2z+kWetDbxQPnVeKPBnREAgAAPfICAALkygIAC1QcAgAFp8oCAAATHgIAAAawAgAACE4CAABlklw==
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:55:52 +0000
Message-ID: <29FB4FF3-54C7-47F4-B5D9-C329A5DA7902@fb.com>
References: <CABkgnnVSCnmzjWOZwQM+ctTxFXVzsVYe6Q3Zzk4yj3LNTYUtHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNo9qmZqmEXBGM4bM6q3EO1FGuUxLSSWsVhNEYsn5u9puQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMR070JUegQbDw--RNr+0XYiBMwaTM3MBmqUo21u922TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDccpuNWnX=Y+gKaPxLEjUOnvu+hr9FqH+R6ZspwOfUq-qg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUPJYG-QE4qxfOd-6AoHHgxVq4K=EyRfoxkcvdDF=oaZA@mail.gmail.com> <2894BA64-BB3C-446C-91D2-6BF4A042AB44@apple.com> <CAN1APdf=+6HzfTXAjiaY1ry+6A0THB_JP+4Gc+OLQLXciVtAdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNqXP+G-jPFJbxWDeaoKnoXck-tt6sz_n9g_EfpttvLtPQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAKcm_gOf79R-DxiG5N9Pmji8aKWoEqcek0D--yj8FJzuWYVyEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gOf79R-DxiG5N9Pmji8aKWoEqcek0D--yj8FJzuWYVyEg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [71.193.192.202]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR15MB1280; 7:im8rzV04p4VBxDvEkMQUcVkR5t5P1wjW1+1juU/ClDDnLwwIQHih7A6uzbPP7j710NFuWhjYcE33pRBdKo/+3p1quGoXfxhifbU6QzneHNfj0tPaKEzx1kEBhFXL1UAz1QMSyhFXnSMaJPGsgiWZYm94r07ZR3+r+gelV5G6CQHFAR9kT/7XHKVkTKErS4WfN12QL3jNa5zdiMp1jNThLS1K+e/btyyUAXevgCdB4tiOkomtv0NG9uUV68Wx0oUK; 20:kEGiefdYVYkbSqDCiK0xuzYyE8XD43rIeK+HDRs2oSgztMl3ODhvQWT/8x0tRZPumZPjnk59pSmkJA1QqQ1nWs+XDlytGQ3EwLPZsUcCJMjQ2AjaDSIwk/G5Ppp1+0bKxVhMYQkq0j3uFrrPdA5hAFKl5SWGhGLhXOgmg/8jUmM=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c0cb89f6-70a7-4508-9d21-08d5852e98fe
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR15MB1280;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR15MB1280:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR15MB12807F76B274646597D264F1B6DF0@MWHPR15MB1280.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040501)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231220)(11241501184)(944501244)(52105095)(6041288)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:MWHPR15MB1280; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR15MB1280;
x-forefront-prvs: 060503E79B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(6512007)(102836004)(6486002)(236005)(106356001)(99286004)(8666007)(86362001)(105586002)(7736002)(7116003)(25786009)(6436002)(33656002)(2900100001)(54896002)(478600001)(76176011)(6506007)(53546011)(3846002)(6116002)(82746002)(93886005)(4326008)(229853002)(5660300001)(39060400002)(5250100002)(8936002)(221733001)(316002)(66066001)(68736007)(54906003)(3660700001)(83716003)(97736004)(81166006)(81156014)(186003)(36756003)(6246003)(14454004)(3480700004)(3280700002)(2906002)(26005)(2950100002)(53936002)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR15MB1280; H:MWHPR15MB1821.namprd15.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: fb.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Q1Js/y2pQ6RbYtLHRn/RJ3lflzTT5umPVvIFX3bFsU5z0vu9HGRjAWl97SumypUkMaYbv5vMn4r6Stx44JhWYE+j05H7b83+ox+PmaD9QQN3rNUkpJSF6z7dTHlxDioGsUieBKhwwZRFlXSHJFBTy4hDGNFuJX5pJ75mRmjIOHkyvbCrPtHX9zK3lip53qUYaVw+abWLVHWh2IZdT1dqxWip90zA1wO8EyHgopcgY7GWdRYR1PY5uqX4eTQkVm6Neclu/cpdIb4ohLCjmmPNLaEehBlaHHEcrhEMkaQFqMBPIULU4JOl/lgRlaP3tcfMPM0Et2VtH39NZtBxk5bThw==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_29FB4FF354C747F4B5D9C329A5DA7902fbcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c0cb89f6-70a7-4508-9d21-08d5852e98fe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Mar 2018 19:55:52.3199 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 8ae927fe-1255-47a7-a2af-5f3a069daaa2
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR15MB1280
X-OriginatorOrg: fb.com
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-08_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
X-FB-Internal: Safe
To: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/zEmTKCopqSIIcxiTOoL5yPHElrI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:56:00 -0000

I agree about keeping the conversations separate and I’m in favor of keeping stateless reset or some form of fast error mechanism.

Subodh

On Mar 8, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

GQUIC inadvertently broke public reset(the predecessor to stateless reset) for a period of time and it had a very visible effect on average latency, so I would like to keep it.

More importantly, I think we should separate the conversation about stateless reset from the this Connection ID one.  Those that want to keep stateless reset are ok with the potential reduction in effectiveness this change can cause and those that want to get rid of it don't care.


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com<mailto:pmcmanus@mozilla.com>> wrote:


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com<mailto:mikkelfj@gmail.com>> wrote:

The only thing is that I am little uneasy about Stateless Reset - is it really needed?


I feel the same way.. let it timeout.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email