Re: [radext] Second WGLC for Publication of TLS-PSK draft as an Informational RFC

Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com> Sun, 15 October 2023 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E89C14CF1C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2023 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=coremem.com header.b="x2zmuuw5"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="PbvDPHFm"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6O6brFuLY9aB for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2023 01:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62943C14CEFF for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2023 01:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123335C0195; Sun, 15 Oct 2023 04:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap46 ([10.202.2.96]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 15 Oct 2023 04:15:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coremem.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1697357701; x=1697444101; bh=Pqq9z9w1DTK/GGpFS3CQJ/rFj7c6evamzb3 KgML7tqw=; b=x2zmuuw5wqYHVFXdlGNzWiRn5B4OoMv78p+pVQNLoI9aKEZYDjh AOdsatbI47c4SziJdXEHyXnpPTXSiUUzodhN6pUaWDMZE/h2UQG8NNe+PieK4ro2 klJdAPe1UZ1s1yWIrs2vVTyTOlR6KKuWfMSnV1a3dymrz+FhjdYQxdm75P+YZb9B 7QcCqMj5NTnWBCuF9KrUNUX6fyh+RgbYvMKDEnm1P5PwWnsmnmpTmQn/GlMT5Eja 1BPIcJP1/s8tVWMxzEavSURfXnQlqCMEXzr2xOvQhwmV31orgVlxcKwq1ni59gIh evk3mqrkQHG/z5f6jNqbEiVqklTmf3Ljsyw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1697357701; x=1697444101; bh=Pqq9z9w1DTK/GGpFS3CQJ/rFj7c6evamzb3 KgML7tqw=; b=PbvDPHFmWFV/eedhrPlUe4uhVvd8FMi0qwMTA3o5wBKofwSFqYJ vd2Nc0+u7osQdOz6/7T/25pajGntRvzfWUA7q4zWfcmcR/RbUB571FUSSvIf1Imj nnuaFo1PNHDT4y2ZNkPVvQ84S0dlR2JakhLrslWeM+TphKAtP2h2fwC68jVa0/To 2psWmyND8fkRkrYQ8q1tIsO0v6kMKtyRmjH8XNyGgv2H1+JUVHlf1pavGF+t7HhT oXox1LlpGbw+0O9TZdrURRy7TKKEeUduRg1II5IaT9FKeVYt/tn0jaCax6xrRdnX vTg4eFoZEnxoQ610aMGIIFw0KYTImmmPezw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:hJ8rZap-HF57CI2o9oG2a2mgABM-uuu0OPNip9giC0FSdNMkrJfDiQ> <xme:hJ8rZYrGnCT0r1GhzYJ_IPcrjFOs03E8H1FnlpfDAvqd7n--aHaf2cDtuivL2tFoc 95eyJU4udhRtq7blA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrieejgddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftehl vgigrghnuggvrhcuvehlohhuthgvrhdfuceorghlvgigodhivghtfhestghorhgvmhgvmh drtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepledtveethfffleelffeludeflefgjeefgeeu heehvedvgeeltedvudelgeelgfdvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvgigodhivghtfhestghorhgvmhgvmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:hJ8rZfPcuBsXxfoYmYJ9Wi_PezoM65Ow7HZJzve5SBpCu0Nf6BJ3Vw> <xmx:hJ8rZZ7RH5PJpbpBPYN1mwONzWjFeWUh9aEn3zKZIuzxD4oNYbGeZw> <xmx:hJ8rZZ74y7gdpIhyqpH25K0SSRaAXOoHhk3ELHNL9yBnf-xLNtPupw> <xmx:hZ8rZaWAO-_pOk30OQxl44f1Obhb50WORnruZvsoBn7ey1m4Fj8GNg>
Feedback-ID: ie3614602:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id AB4F12A20085; Sun, 15 Oct 2023 04:15:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1019-ged83ad8595-fm-20231002.001-ged83ad85
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <fd9f818d-b831-4d7b-890a-a90c6395d9e8@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <684DF261-E2C0-4FEE-96FE-39E31557FB93@gmail.com>
References: <8054A794-3294-4B53-A8AA-7FE32F8B6A3B@deployingradius.com> <684DF261-E2C0-4FEE-96FE-39E31557FB93@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 09:14:40 +0100
From: Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
To: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/-9mF2KMjC1pNFIYXR_d8i7qbC2Y>
Subject: Re: [radext] Second WGLC for Publication of TLS-PSK draft as an Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 08:15:09 -0000

On Sat, 14 Oct 2023, at 08:31, Margaret Cullen wrote:
>
> The original Working Group Last Call for the publication of TLS-PSK as 
> an Informational RFC received positive and constructive responses 
> leading to several changes in the document.
>
> This is a second “Last Call” which will be open through Sunday, October 
> 22nd.  Please respond with a clear indication that you DO SUPPORt or DO 
> NOT SUPPORT publication of the document.  This a new call, so please 
> respond again, even if you responded to the previous call.

I DO SUPPORT publication.