Re: [radext] Preliminary Agenda for the radext meeting at IETF91

[Alan DeKok <[e-mail]>]

Stefan Winter wrote:
> Jouni and I have asked for the usual 90 min slot, but were given a 120
> min slot instead. Hooray!

  Room for more discussion. :)

> In particular, we will need to recharter to get new work on board (
> specifically, for -datatypes and -coa-proxy ) and I'd like to discuss
> that in the meeting.

  I think the list of re-charter items is fine.

  We might want to add the accounting work.  But the interest in that
seems to have disappeared.

> I'm still working on the exact proposed text for a new charter, but
> "semantic changelog" of items that need work are in the attached agenda
> draft.

  For me:

- the NAI document is essentially done, barring last-minute reviews

- the data types document is essentially done.  Based on feedback from
  Sam, I'll add a "concat" type for EAP-Message.  But all feedback
  has been positive.  The document now contains explicit updates to
  the IANA registry

- the CoA proxy document is rough.  It needs cleaning up and finalizing.
  the main issue here is that Diameter has a "Operastor-NAS-IP-Address"
  (IIRC), which is the IP of the NAS.

  The feedback from RADEXT was that for security, we wanted to give out
  and opaque token to identify the NAS, instead of using an IP address.

  Once that's settled, I think I can finalize the document.  It's been
  discussed for ~2 years now, with no controversy.

  Alan DeKok.