Re: [radext] Preliminary Agenda for the radext meeting at IETF91

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 20 October 2014 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233F41A88C2 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUR08SWHMDJB for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [195.154.231.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4489D1A88DD for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591C222405E2; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:43:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9MyafXQhVB6; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:43:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Thor.local (76-10-152-73.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.152.73]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0D2F22405AC; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:43:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <544549B7.6050605@deployingradius.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:43:19 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
References: <5444BD92.6050200@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <5444BD92.6050200@restena.lu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/5dqBltbioZoiRz4gbDyzIZdcjpo
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Preliminary Agenda for the radext meeting at IETF91
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:43:55 -0000

Stefan Winter wrote:
> Jouni and I have asked for the usual 90 min slot, but were given a 120
> min slot instead. Hooray!

  Room for more discussion. :)

> In particular, we will need to recharter to get new work on board (
> specifically, for -datatypes and -coa-proxy ) and I'd like to discuss
> that in the meeting.

  I think the list of re-charter items is fine.

  We might want to add the accounting work.  But the interest in that
seems to have disappeared.

> I'm still working on the exact proposed text for a new charter, but
> "semantic changelog" of items that need work are in the attached agenda
> draft.

  For me:

- the NAI document is essentially done, barring last-minute reviews

- the data types document is essentially done.  Based on feedback from
  Sam, I'll add a "concat" type for EAP-Message.  But all feedback
  has been positive.  The document now contains explicit updates to
  the IANA registry

- the CoA proxy document is rough.  It needs cleaning up and finalizing.
  the main issue here is that Diameter has a "Operastor-NAS-IP-Address"
  (IIRC), which is the IP of the NAS.

  The feedback from RADEXT was that for security, we wanted to give out
  and opaque token to identify the NAS, instead of using an IP address.

  Once that's settled, I think I can finalize the document.  It's been
  discussed for ~2 years now, with no controversy.

  Alan DeKok.