IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-radext-dtls-04

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Sat, 06 April 2013 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5261921F8E51 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 05:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8Nd1Q1Sxv4k for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 05:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10A921F8E06 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3C12240D85; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:52:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4PgWb1RtlQr; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:52:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Thor-2.local (bas1-ottawa11-1176224750.dsl.bell.ca [70.27.195.238]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4712240777; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51601A79.7020300@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:52:09 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Nelson <dnelson@elbrys.com>
References: <1A5FDF7C-9E93-447E-A103-9700349CB2F5@gmail.com> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1304021450180.3988@SMURF> <515C3604.3040406@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1304042021411.3988@SMURF> <515EDBB8.2020101@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1304052202020.3988@SMURF> <CAM+1sVAYMFKkKyT2Cx8SVpLa0aMNJu+K2DvcHcR70-7uKp03yQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM+1sVAYMFKkKyT2Cx8SVpLa0aMNJu+K2DvcHcR70-7uKp03yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: radext mailing list <radext@ietf.org>, Peter Deacon <peterd@iea-software.com>, radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-radext-dtls-04
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 12:52:57 -0000

Dave Nelson wrote:
> I was wondering why starting up a replacement RADIUS server offering
> RADIUS/DTLS on another IP address, and then switching the RADIUS server
> IP address on each client as it's upgraded -- it has to be upgraded --
> wouldn't accomplish the same overlapped, make-before-break transition as
> a single server that supports two modes of operation?

  Yes.

  Switching ports would work, too.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status