Re: [radext] NAI draft: consensus on the name "Network" Access Identifier?

Stefan Paetow <Stefan.Paetow@ja.net> Tue, 05 August 2014 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Stefan.Paetow@ja.net>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659C1A024E for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 05:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMlMftaXRiw8 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 05:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from har003676.ukerna.ac.uk (har003676.ukerna.ac.uk [194.82.140.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3A81A01A8 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 05:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from har003676.ukerna.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 0182F4A6BA6_3E0D076B for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:39:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from EXC001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk (exc001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk [193.62.83.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "staffmail.ja.net", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by har003676.ukerna.ac.uk (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTPS id CC7E74A6BA1_3E0D075F for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:39:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from EXC001.atlas.ukerna.ac.uk ([193.62.83.37]) by EXC001 ([193.62.83.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:39:17 +0100
From: Stefan Paetow <Stefan.Paetow@ja.net>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [radext] NAI draft: consensus on the name "Network" Access Identifier?
Thread-Index: AQHPrWaWK/J0uvHkfEiGMDd5PW3UqZvB+Y4w
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:39:16 +0000
Message-ID: <C072996E0B81144DBB9426B44462540C0D692B1C@EXC001>
References: <53DB5025.10908@restena.lu> <0E802CC7-3A07-4B23-8494-842423BDBAE4@cardiff.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <0E802CC7-3A07-4B23-8494-842423BDBAE4@cardiff.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.11.218]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/85MFz7kh-9DjZT8iH5UGOb-gcR8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:15:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [radext] NAI draft: consensus on the name "Network" Access Identifier?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:40:31 -0000

> On 1 Aug 2014, at 09:30, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:
>
> > A few people have already voiced their opinion and an emerging 
> > consensus seems to be that Network Access Identifier is a too 
> > well-known term to change.
> > 
> > I'd like to confirm consensus on the list that this is the way to go.
>
> +1 from me. Keep the name the same but add some text to say that it's not meant to be used in the network access context only.

+1 for Rhys' suggestion. 

Stefan

Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a 
not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238