Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback

Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> Sat, 26 July 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40B51B27FA for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNeIjbc0RCqA for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90661B27D9 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A8E2240267; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:01:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTttLjld6e0u; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:01:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (192-0-132-212.cpe.teksavvy.com [192.0.132.212]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51EDD224024E; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:01:47 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7537ECFF-8D52-4D4E-AAAE-5E90B387C149"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.1 (86d0425)
From: Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
In-Reply-To: <2254D673-36FF-4B64-AC0C-A7AC9CE4991A@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:01:44 -0400
Message-Id: <413B2EA8-AD1F-4EB1-9B92-2FD420F9F3EA@freeradius.org>
References: <mailman.0.1406300368.3016.radext@ietf.org> <D1A82475-4CAA-49D8-A2E3-AC07F4879F15@freeradius.org> <53D2FB0A.1050002@gmail.com> <2254D673-36FF-4B64-AC0C-A7AC9CE4991A@deployingradius.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/BCwGtLr08hJcSl8lk6kgG51C_Mo
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:01:55 -0000

>> On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Just for my clarification, we did not handle draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext during the meeting, thus which document is meant here then? I assume draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext is meant here, right.

draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01 appears to be a retitled version of draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext with some updates.

My points all still apply to draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext.

Alan's point about IPFIX still applies. 

draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext does now use Sub-TLVs.

The bulk of the document is the same.

I guess there's no meta data added to drafts when they're republished under a different title?

-Arran

Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
FreeRADIUS development team

FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2