IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5176 (4280)

Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1FB1A0070 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:07:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_T00w2hqUjd for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B5B1A9076 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.17) by BLUPR03MB151.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.9; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:07:49 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.106]) by BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.106]) with mapi id 15.01.0099.004; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:07:49 +0000
From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "mchiba@cisco.com" <mchiba@cisco.com>, "gdommety@cisco.com" <gdommety@cisco.com>, "meklund@cisco.com" <meklund@cisco.com>, "david@mitton.com" <david@mitton.com>, "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "stefan.winter@restena.lu" <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, "lionel.morand@orange.com" <lionel.morand@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5176 (4280)
Thread-Index: AQHQUHJgGUk59TUm6EeB8xcdubqOpJ0Aa+jQ
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:07:49 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB1497BA8D4B7777E18060FD4EC160@BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20150224204147.6CCC6181B3D@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150224204147.6CCC6181B3D@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [131.107.160.89]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB151;
x-o365ent-eop-header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR03MB1510239554DF858CA37A2A9C3160@BLUPR03MB151.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005004); SRVR:BLUPR03MB151; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB151;
x-forefront-prvs: 04976078F0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(13464003)(2501003)(33656002)(74316001)(16799955002)(15188155005)(86612001)(101416001)(15975445007)(86362001)(2950100001)(64706001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(68736005)(66066001)(2900100001)(92566002)(97736003)(76576001)(122556002)(105586002)(106116001)(106356001)(99286002)(40100003)(102836002)(50986999)(62966003)(76176999)(54356999)(46102003)(2201001)(87936001)(77156002)(2656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB151; H:BLUPR03MB149.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Feb 2015 23:07:49.2469 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB151
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/F9xurMeHD4NJd55vPhlXcQHhUCs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:28:00 -0800
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, "aland@freeradius.org" <aland@freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5176 (4280)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:07:58 -0000

The Description text should also be addressed in this Errata:

   Description

      It is possible that a Dynamic Authorization Server cannot honor
      Disconnect-Request or CoA-Request packets for some reason.  The
      Error-Cause Attribute provides more detail on the cause of the
      problem.  It MAY be included within CoA-NAK and Disconnect-NAK
      packets.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:42 PM
To: mchiba@cisco.com; gdommety@cisco.com; meklund@cisco.com; david@mitton.com; Bernard Aboba; bclaise@cisco.com; joelja@bogus.com; stefan.winter@restena.lu; lionel.morand@orange.com
Cc: aland@freeradius.org; radext@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5176 (4280)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5176, "Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5176&eid=4280

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>

Section: 3.6

Original Text
-------------
   0         0        0+  101   Error-Cause


In both tables, for CoA and Disconnect messages.

Corrected Text
--------------
   0         0+        0+  101   Error-Cause


In both tables, for CoA and Disconnect messages.

Notes
-----
Section 3.5 says that Error-Cause may be sent in a CoA-ACK or Disconnect-ACK packet:

      ...
      Values 200-299 represent successful completion, so that these
      values may only be sent within CoA-ACK or Disconnect-ACK packets

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5176 (draft-ietf-radext-rfc3576bis-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)
Publication Date    : January 2008
Author(s)           : M. Chiba, G. Dommety, M. Eklund, D. Mitton, B. Aboba
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : RADIUS EXTensions
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email