Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 29 July 2014 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB811A00AD for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IB7cwMZIsbwX for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CAEF1A0086 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l4so6568323lbv.2 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F38fDBmaX8069TGv0EtOBPiitXDN+1sPAEKx2OnQiPw=; b=b7QjuIOLv+K0OfA6+RdgtjqlSFR2uofgdw2sILZtrHhjsVr9WoSGAKEgdVhrHM6DxR yBzSgHmnO3Vek155wBMulduzzNTNvcmiSJnrIBrSQ4ybX0kfxSsQcCuczLPtkvw0ipYd ZJf8lWTqj8n9E2tBFn28koqjvMbqNRxfpzmFoR7DPrvd56FYwareAKij5hXM7BSbl8XV bVaz2ZWIN6/iNhrrqTzMv3Z9ZAd5qDNaffbtU6/WMwZRTYWFcrU4LLpp3piXcDEdGfHB DfyOwygZFJ/IjBY5vagljxphay7XOXwOpc6AEYk4oa5/iGImwwEzin34kybaJtCXmOhi N5Lw==
X-Received: by 10.152.207.76 with SMTP id lu12mr612267lac.49.1406622903363; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.17.0.21] ([83.150.126.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id la6sm13843064lac.12.2014.07.29.01.35.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D75CB4.8000908@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:35:00 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
References: <mailman.0.1406300368.3016.radext@ietf.org> <D1A82475-4CAA-49D8-A2E3-AC07F4879F15@freeradius.org> <53D2FB0A.1050002@gmail.com> <2254D673-36FF-4B64-AC0C-A7AC9CE4991A@deployingradius.com> <413B2EA8-AD1F-4EB1-9B92-2FD420F9F3EA@freeradius.org>
In-Reply-To: <413B2EA8-AD1F-4EB1-9B92-2FD420F9F3EA@freeradius.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/GjTtE8ETuMPZ07piSGhIbTrPa7s
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:35:08 -0000


7/26/2014 4:01 PM, Arran Cudbard-Bell kirjoitti:
>
>>> On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Just for my clarification, we did not handle draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext during the meeting, thus which document is meant here then? I assume draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext is meant here, right.
>
> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01 appears to be a retitled version of draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext with some updates.
>
> My points all still apply to draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext.
>
> Alan's point about IPFIX still applies.
>
> draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext does now use Sub-TLVs.
>
> The bulk of the document is the same.
>
> I guess there's no meta data added to drafts when they're republished under a different title?

Nope.. drafts are quite free terrotiry to do whatever folks want ;)

- Jouni

>
> -Arran
>
> Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
> FreeRADIUS development team
>
> FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
>