IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-01.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 02 July 2014 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE191B2833 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SM2tq2e8EIVU for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945E91B29D1 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8075620740 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:30:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2tGThfqxHry3 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-177-27-27.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.177.27.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 4073081B69; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <20140702173249.16770.42550.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:34:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20140702173249.16770.42550.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> (internet-drafts@ietf.org's message of "Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:32:49 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsl1tu3psvi.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/HTIKreUkqKBNsezfjG5PGGo3jjg
Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-01.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:34:15 -0000


I've posted a new version of the bigger packets draft.
This includes the IANA actions, and I believe there are no open issues
with the draft.

--Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email