Re: [radext] Start of Call for Adoption for draft-dekok-radext-datatypes-05

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75C81A1A75 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJiOxxcM2DtY for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD4C31A0404 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (unknown [69.59.217.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B21E2CA1E; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: lionel.morand@orange.com, radext@ietf.org
References: <5711_1427820647_551AD067_5711_8035_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36EEF68A4@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <5711_1427820647_551AD067_5711_8035_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36EEF68A4@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:58:47 -0700
Message-ID: <039f01d06bd3$f55e64e0$e01b2ea0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIYBytR8V/Yiw90jCQkqchfLpq6OpynmYXA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/NTHJ_PNLmcqTYwrdLHSbeDZe6jo>
Cc: radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Start of Call for Adoption for draft-dekok-radext-datatypes-05
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:59:58 -0000

Yes we should adopt this draft.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: radext [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> lionel.morand@orange.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:51 AM
> To: radext@ietf.org
> Cc: radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [radext] Start of Call for Adoption for
draft-dekok-radext-datatypes-
> 05
> 
> During the RADEXT session at IETF92, , the authors of draft-dekok-radext-
> datatypes-05 have asked for adoption of this individual draft as WG
document.
> 
> This email officially starts a call for adoption for the following
document:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dekok-radext-datatypes-05
> 
> Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send comments
> by 2015-04-06.
> 
> In addition, following the strategy for promoting compliance with the IPR
> disclosure rules (RFC6702), the chairs would like to check  whether there
are
> claims of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the document that need to
be
> disclosed. Therefore, the following questions are addressed to the WG and
> especially Authors and Contributors of the draft:
> 
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-dekok-radext-
> datatypes-05? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF
IPR
> rules?  (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378  for more details.)
> 
> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document,
please
> reply to this email message regardless of whether or not you are
personally
> aware of any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance this document
to
> the next stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed
> contributor.
> 
> If you are on the RADEXT WG email list but are not an author or listed
> contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a
> voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do not reply  unless you
want
> to make such a voluntary disclosure.
> 
> Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at
> <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lionel & Stefan
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________________________
> _
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
exploites
> ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur,
veuillez
> le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes.
Les
> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline
toute
> responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed,
> used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext