Re: [radext] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B4A129642; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxipSYBKVcD6; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F248C1295D5; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b186so25081578vkb.1; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MWQGNuGfpRu72ZiqVAgHB5H/0B6tjkYEpEewp9VnepQ=; b=gYoYtFq3blRap6h07G11efHSwQY8vQDX4bvdhov4RAdbCLpVw1hn9E/ytPjX/QBns+ FmIyrsAWmz/7wAfCvUBVHppGO6uj03wcKmfFqes4Snpod1rwNn1T+ovZbAoMinQwpRbg 0GaXFrgR93Ys3H6s5xHnJ117hLvhqVUYFHEg8DNWmmVZCTjztnncrquHawFPrToIyavF Htr76aYAhcaKVg++WADQfme5OOEdCFmyqotUQ2o/Y76N9G54QoG5MoeQcoO1bqVouq5C rXMAwJ85H+qkrqU+IIFej/XkGG0460fquLud4Ln86rbZjYH+tVz3V5Jm7oMtEFdw4QVN Q+KQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MWQGNuGfpRu72ZiqVAgHB5H/0B6tjkYEpEewp9VnepQ=; b=VH4WVQH5JdxF8dqCuEynGdI+oQCq6Wj2ZyA7NO4SlUUd37VNkmCZlP04nJAyeszKxK qEIyWSRQSU4zcBaZJUkhaMh/uqWIk6v1hQMqYgBdtNVMUCd1PoyTBNUhcugNUTkytusZ o6ChVre6+XCfcVx3N3CTx1inC5pYbUa01CWzxp2Bocw0769AOUFDSbTTJyHPpGDqvsK1 XfUkqEMEHV7n6jmAwGxVWD+ZY1BqaNcjCGhMQEbnwKWAwUfHZByIwOfbjtlORTdIiyzm aDnke+jRSGy+7XTXAoz7dL6cROIYy8lPxYrxtXlLTNx7If8DOCe0xMQNTJQkClV7R5qZ Gbig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rnvn8x7wJAsvtbWofHH6uL7t1SqnnWBQaSQy16e99rJ7+x+LbbK7jYGKTl+ApTO+vG/tlPi48+pG1Fniw==
X-Received: by 10.31.73.71 with SMTP id w68mr3230602vka.13.1476203214857; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.82.68 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643E3D90B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <147140538762.19947.17983354603426554979.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CF628B01-AD10-4C33-970D-754295F2AA25@deployingradius.com> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643E3D90B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:26:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4q9vE+zR00=TSGcObVE=P3jCqgpk16Ce16han31KYQ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148d00a3ced74053e9958b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/Nji0QuLI6GlTtwRn4y7jVlgiaqg>
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-radext-datatypes@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-radext-datatypes@ietf.org>, Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "radext-chairs@ietf.org" <radext-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:27:01 -0000

Hi Suresh,

The new version was posted.  Can you check to see if you are satisfied with
the changes?

Thank you,
Kathleen

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Suresh Krishnan <
suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Alan,
>    Thanks for your response. I will clear once you post a new version with
> the changes.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> On 08/18/2016 12:36 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:43 AM, Suresh Krishnan <
> suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> * Section 3.10
> >>
> >> It is not clear from this definition how exactly a sender needs to
> encode
> >> this attribute on the wire. e.g. From the spec it looks like an IPv6
> >> prefix such 2001:db8:dead:beef::/64 can legally be encoded using
> anywhere
> >> between 8 octets and 16 octets. What exactly is the preferred encoding?
> >> If you intend to allow all of the encodings can you please add an
> >> explicit statement to say so.
> >
> >   The preferred encoding should be the shortest one.  I'll put some text
> together.
> >
> >> * I am not sure why this document uses Reserved fields in sections 3.10
> >> and 3.11. Is it for alignment? Please clarify. I don't see exactly why
> >> aligning a 4 octet or a 16 octet value to a 16 bit boundary would
> provide
> >> any value.
> >> (I personally think such padding related stuff should be in the
> >> definition of the radius attribute that uses the datatype and not in the
> >> datatype itself but I will not block on this.)
> >
> >   The data types in 3.10 and 3.11 are taken from previous
> specifications.  I'm not entirely sure why they have reserved fields,
> either.
> >
> >   We can't change the format of the data type, because implementations
> use this format.  The document just codifies existing practices.
> >
> >> * Section 3.7
> >>
> >> I think this text is confusing because "octet string" and network byte
> >> order do not seem to be compatible. Suggest rewording
> >>
> >> OLD:
> >> The "ifid" data type encodes an Interface-Id as an 8-octet string in
> >>   network byte order
> >>
> >> NEW:
> >> The "ifid" data type encodes an 8 octet IPv6 Interface Identifier in
> >>   network byte order
> >
> >   Sounds good.
> >
> >> * Section 3.10 and 3.11
> >>
> >> The separator between the Reserved field and the Prefix Length field is
> >> off by one position.
> >
> >   Fixed.
> >
>
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen