Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Tue, 25 March 2014 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147D61A0386 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oe4I-DClZUW3 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769C61A0369 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926D10583 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:09:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D971057E for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:09:06 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <53314783.6070802@restena.lu>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:08:19 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <53285DE2.9040802@cisco.com> <035801cf42d2$99464b80$cbd2e280$@augustcellars.com> <5328C172.5080305@deployingradius.com> <53303FB2.8090002@restena.lu> <53313E73.4030502@um.es>
In-Reply-To: <53313E73.4030502@um.es>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xrUW87ec0WFb2CeMkOA2etWpb009qOxCc"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/PjRidLEM-r_RYNkHDIL4pcFCarY
Subject: Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:09:11 -0000

Hi,

> I think it is a good idea to have such a section, specially is you think
> it will be requested by ops-dir reviewers if not present. I would place
> it as section 10, right before "Security considerations" section,
> instead of in the Introduction section, to avoid basing the explanations
> on something that has not been described yet.

Great, please go ahead.

> I also think that the "formal violation..." discussion should be moved
> here. We could also include the "proxying based on User-Name"
> restriction too.

Sounds like a reasonable move to me.

Note that none of this removes the need for the working group to settle
on the questions:

- should we try to achieve an "Updates" relationship to RFC6929?
- should there be an IANA registry for the flags of extended attributes?

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

> 
> Regards,
> Alejandro
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Stefan Winter
>>
>>>> I believe that this update relationship needs to be retained.
>>>   It may be useful, but IETF process may forbid it.
>>>
>>>   Alan DeKok.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> radext mailing list
>>> radext@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> radext mailing list
>> radext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
> 


-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66