Re: [radext] WGLC for Publication of TLS-PSK draft as an Informational RFC

Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com> Thu, 17 August 2023 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A666BC151520 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=coremem.com header.b="l1z0DsBl"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="k/PIn4Bm"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mgI_EwAOPvw for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1108BC151097 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA23320076F for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap46 ([10.202.2.96]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:23:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coremem.com; h= cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1692289433; x=1692375833; bh=O/ cui6Czvy68V4xpNhq7/9OrzVHrWl6roeB4EF2bSYg=; b=l1z0DsBlaihbhfx2C/ 04TkZM4e/bim4diErRHvD1VupT/C83APaBSwS6XmTK+RKPwIjzMwGcPQI+bT7wg/ dNk7YfyPiS6mBXvnx3JY0HiaRetVvz67m/e7gqo02FcjT1N9Co4tMi3Qvj23kN5Q aFMS+SU9DL9Lvf3E9G7GqY5xUTKGoO4ZLSrDvpFcNcNX2vi1Dpn6jFMc5wV48rGM CdGuGSJSfUcmQuCkzXAphRPyQlZA58sqo87AS/HFEmT29Vi/OOYEizgC/QAFOSQw LeG7wNexawwQ+ovihKrjp3aL+C4ljWNWK9akxLyy4/Xr0MJR3lBa5atPx6RSyR4a YVKA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1692289433; x=1692375833; bh=O/cui6Czvy68V 4xpNhq7/9OrzVHrWl6roeB4EF2bSYg=; b=k/PIn4Bmggo/OYihrBDFhVYMlMTo6 99u2O1l2nZHilObYqqCth6MQ2j9hgAo22zzjsLpYcO3d3zvE428r+aPZXCFkUBcs aHqoBxUyNEpqQraHHqLBoKQmuMJsm25mBe4GFbqsqDWJI1G13wYrnS7x+DknopQ9 Ffzd16tUGOcJmVMUtTQFu3UqYPv6q8RKfgjipk064hpzeadc8spoyC9kBPV85sMN vH/3erDEExJkpWljs0/QIG3/waLgGbR83QObPOSP/jJC4VUg7zoeLz+T4rO58X9O wlisl+tCfV848tOFoP7FBnYoUtH8v5U9HdsJ9pk4fMmDNEs70RyQIKn+Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mUneZAHyJna2FWpxfZDEhBWkkGJcIo8utUYnaB3eQCCIoUS4iGfEBg> <xme:mUneZJUM5Ir-3ftV4sCnFp38PqaoAEvY1z0CoLNByD12czFVGH9IaRRj99h7jjo38 h_DTH0RB8ssLJm1Fg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudduuddguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgvgigrnhguvghrucevlhhouhhtvghrfdcuoegr lhgvgidoihgvthhfsegtohhrvghmvghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedutd dvhedvgfdvieejheffgfelgeduhfetvddtuddukeffjeejiefhledukeetudenucffohhm rghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvgigodhivghtfhestghorhgvmhgvmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mUneZKKRI821yxo7JReTNYaGQ_lWHJcRBcC_WY76hRfPmGQCbprEKA> <xmx:mUneZCH6N0_WxHToDCp1Hp6KufWjkHP3Cr5OzPzRn3FdGcStkLLAbA> <xmx:mUneZGXqPnaVGQDAKaT3yCY_94yfcQqgmH6w5yyYzjvbWiF5LxTMAQ> <xmx:mUneZOg7yZDDZqNpeMpwfF9_ux-Hat_2tdg5qHYrQH1f-0_GI5zsjw>
Feedback-ID: ie3614602:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 70C602A2008B; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-624-g7714e4406d-fm-20230801.001-g7714e440
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <58d314ce-59cb-4df6-805c-06809a4ba050@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <617FA25F-6A72-46ED-962D-CDB8C439B0EE@gmail.com>
References: <617FA25F-6A72-46ED-962D-CDB8C439B0EE@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:23:33 +0100
From: Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
To: radext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/RzRLhfhGoee5PzxEH1oV-5ll69M>
Subject: Re: [radext] WGLC for Publication of TLS-PSK draft as an Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:23:59 -0000

On Thu, 3 Aug 2023, at 17:13, Margaret Cullen wrote:
> This is an official, two-week Working Group Last Call for sending the 
> TLS-PSK draft 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk/) to the 
> IESG for publication as an Informational RFC.  This call will run for 
> two weeks, ending at 1800 UTC on Thursday August 17th.
>
> Please read the draft.  Then, reply to this message indicating that you 
> DO SUPPORT or DO NOT SUPPORT sending this document to the IESG for 
> publication.  If you DO NOT SUPPORT publication of the draft as-is, 
> please list any blocking issues that should, in your opinion, prevent 
> publication of this document.  If possible, suggest text that would 
> resolve your issue.

I do NOT support publication, some rewording has been done since the last draft that I would like to see in at least one further draft release.

Thanks