IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Wed, 20 March 2013 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA3821F8F41 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hlo7zF3f42aX for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD6621F851C for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD1210590 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:07:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:2c8d:1153:26f:7c78]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6681058E for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:07:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5149B49C.8080909@restena.lu>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:07:40 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <20130128155031.8392.45953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5147172F.8090100@restena.lu> <08fd01ce23f5$cf8d0b90$6ea722b0$@augustcellars.com> <tslfvzsvd24.fsf@mit.edu> <091f01ce240a$6705a860$3510f920$@augustcellars.com> <51476C2C.5070000@deployingradius.com> <5148192B.90507@restena.lu> <514868A0.2040207@deployingradius.com> <5148822F.5070708@restena.lu> <5148A6FB.9050807@deployingradius.com> <51497429.9090607@restena.lu> <a57bcde8fb3b0cf818a8f9fa854ca159@localhost> <5149B2DE.1010106@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <5149B2DE.1010106@deployingradius.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2LJQXGRFICWGXNRRQSIRK"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:07:45 -0000

Hi,

>   That text is ambiguous about whether or not you re-write the NAI in
> the packet.  People will read it incorrectly.  How about this:
> 
>   Implementations which expect to receive a NAI, but get non-normalised
>   (but otherwise valid) UTF-8 strings instead SHOULD attempt to create a
>   local version of the NAI, which is normalized from the input
>   identifier.  This local version can then be used for local processing.

Sounds good to me.

Stefan

-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status