[radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 24 July 2024 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74670C14F6A3 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 901o6WjukFb8 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35DDDC14F617 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-8578.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.133.120]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D51BB5ED; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:00:23 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <E66DC2E7-1D48-4B9F-BB3D-1D87D1E25F61@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:00:18 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39C18E1E-B1D0-407E-8AA6-20E513C7E308@deployingradius.com>
References: <E66DC2E7-1D48-4B9F-BB3D-1D87D1E25F61@gmail.com>
To: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: FCM2ED2ADQCX63AKQX6KRKIHICUUH4ZQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: FCM2ED2ADQCX63AKQX6KRKIHICUUH4ZQ
X-MailFrom: aland@deployingradius.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-radext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/WHGIH2Tvpuu8EB--3CekNzcUPF0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:radext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:radext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:radext-leave@ietf.org>
On Jul 24, 2024, at 1:37 PM, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com> wrote: > > On a separate but related noteā¦. > > I came across this attack while reading about TLS mutual authentication: > > https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/347.pdf > Nice! And :( > Is this something we should consider before we recommend the use of TLS-PSK with TLS 1.3? Or has this issues already been addressed? This is discussed in RFC 9527: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9257#section-8 I'll have to do a deeper dive to see how this affects the TLS-PSK document. Alan DeKok.
- [radext] Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Bernard Aboba
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Fabian Mauchle
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK hannes.tschofenig
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK josh.howlett
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK josh.howlett
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Q Misell
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Alan DeKok
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Fabian Mauchle
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Q Misell
- [radext] Re: Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK Margaret Cullen