Re: [radext] New DTLS document

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288BE21F8480 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clG+OrHAki35 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3147B21F8206 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE792241035; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:15:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VzCFcqsYHWZ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:15:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Thor-2.local (bas1-ottawa11-1176121151.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.47.63]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8FFE2240FF8; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <517EB8CE.3020805@deployingradius.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:42 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <C47910C2-BCEA-4DC2-A016-C98D67B62DD9@gmail.com> <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628B4032E@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> <tslsj298ime.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslsj298ime.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: radext@ietf.org, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:16:40 -0000

Sam Hartman wrote:
> Question: is the text Joe is concerned about still intended to be in the
> draft?
> That is, do we still want to specify running both over the same port as
> an option?

  It's still in the draft, as a migration step.  The text in the draft
says that implementations should migrate to either using a dedicated
port, or to only allowing DTLS over the traditional ports.

  Alan DeKok.