Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-03.txt

Alejandro Perez Mendez <alex@um.es> Mon, 17 February 2014 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@um.es>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DFC1A004C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:46:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrLwhiOIzIOZ for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xenon22.um.es (xenon22.um.es [155.54.212.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66C71A0041 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7117A12AEB for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:46:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon22.um.es
Received: from xenon22.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon22.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fGPLkrHHZZCR for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:46:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [155.54.205.49] (inf-205-49.inf.um.es [155.54.205.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alex) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F20212860 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:46:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5301BE65.1020607@um.es>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:46:45 +0100
From: Alejandro Perez Mendez <alex@um.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <20140214132532.1455.32665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52FE19C1.7050003@um.es> <051c01cf2a8d$11ff8ef0$35feacd0$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <051c01cf2a8d$11ff8ef0$35feacd0$@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080306020702000601000305"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/a3uYloHRSKNeFwy9WnE1pHDzNWM
Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-03.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:46:54 -0000

El 15/02/14 21:32, Jim Schaad escribió:
>
> So based on your document, I assume that this is correct
>
> 0 1                   2                   3
>
>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |     Type      |    Length     | Extended-Type |M|  Reserved |T|
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |     Value ...
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>

That's right. Nice figure, btw :)
However, I'd rather put the T flag next to the M flag (offset 25). Did 
you had any reason for not doing so?

Regards,
Alejandro

> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: radext [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro
>
> > Perez Mendez
>
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 5:27 AM
>
> > To: radext@ietf.org
>
> > Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-
>
> > 03.txt
>
> >
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > we just submitted an updated version of the draft, taking into 
> account the
>
> > received comments.
>
> >
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Alejandro
>
> >
>
> > El 14/02/14 14:25, internet-drafts@ietf.org 
> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> escribi :
>
> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>
> > directories.
>
> > >   This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group 
> of the
>
> > IETF.
>
> > >
>
> > >          Title           : Support of fragmentation of RADIUS packets
>
> > >          Authors         : Alejandro Perez-Mendez
>
> > > Rafa Marin-Lopez
>
> > > Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia
>
> > > Gabriel Lopez-Millan
>
> > > Diego R. Lopez
>
> > > Alan DeKok
>
> > >          Filename        : 
> draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-03.txt
>
> > >          Pages           : 28
>
> > >          Date            : 2014-02-14
>
> > >
>
> > > Abstract:
>
> > >     The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) 
> protocol is
>
> > >     limited to a total packet size of 4096 octets.  Provisions 
> exist for
>
> > >     fragmenting large amounts of authentication data across multiple
>
> > >     packets, via Access-Challenge.  No similar provisions exist for
>
> > >     fragmenting large amounts of authorization data.  This document
>
> > >     specifies how existing RADIUS mechanisms can be leveraged to 
> provide
>
> > >     that functionality.  These mechanisms are largely compatible with
>
> > >     existing implementations, and are designed to be invisible to
>
> > >     proxies, and "fail-safe" to legacy clients and servers.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentatio
>
> > > n/
>
> > >
>
> > > There's also a htmlized version available at:
>
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-03
>
> > >
>
> > > A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentatio
>
> > > n-03
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>
> > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> > >
>
> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>
> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> > >
>
> > > _______________________________________________
>
> > > radext mailing list
>
> > > radext@ietf.org <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
>
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > radext mailing list
>
> > radext@ietf.org <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext