IETF Logo Mail Archive

[radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-16.txt)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Fri, 11 November 2016 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 510ED12947C; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3B4129858 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PuFG_EotPb4o for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEB412947C for <draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CB5E18BB for <draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:04:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 860B8C20515; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:04:46 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-935820@icann.org> <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-11930-1478822686-466.935820-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #935820
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:04:46 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20161111000449.510ED12947C@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:04:49 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/bZL0Oy9VQcP5PVHaLQbIFgmzFV4>
Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org
Subject: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-16.txt)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:04:49 -0000

Dear Authors,

The IANA Services Operator is not yet able to complete the registry actions for this document. We still need an answer to this question:

Section 7.3 calls for registrations in the "RADIUS TLVs" registry, but we haven't been able to locate a registry by that name. (Please see http://www.iana.org/protocols for a list.)

Is this document creating a registry called RADIUS TLVs? If so, this section needs to note that it's creating a registry, provide a registration procedure (see RFC 5226), and let us know 1) whether value 0 should be listed as "Unassigned" or "Reserved" and 2) what the registry's maximum value is, if it has one.

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
PTI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email