Re: [radext] Call for Adopting the Reverse COA Draft as a WG Work Item

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Thu, 03 August 2023 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF591C15DF79 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LNdWQMNBaEqk for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C908C1524AE for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (135-23-95-173.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.95.173]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54FBC382; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:18:00 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D7B7437-74CD-4737-BC9B-64273C0FC84D@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 12:17:58 -0400
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8521FB3F-7D81-489D-874A-CBC90C5AFFC1@deployingradius.com>
References: <6D7B7437-74CD-4737-BC9B-64273C0FC84D@gmail.com>
To: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/c73Bm13DmDQIEOsdQ-Fx12WPzPw>
Subject: Re: [radext] Call for Adopting the Reverse COA Draft as a WG Work Item
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:18:08 -0000

  I support adoption.

  Tho it may be good to change the name to something less confusing.  Suggestions are welcome.

> On Aug 3, 2023, at 11:57 AM, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi radext folks,
> 
> This is an official call for adopting the Reverse COA draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekok-radext-reverse-coa/) as a working group work item.  This draft is intended to fulfill the following WG charter item:
> 
> 	• "Allow for CoA / Disconnect packets to be sent in "reverse" down aRADIUS/TLS or RADIUS/DTLS connection. This functionality assists with transit of NATs.”
> 
> Please read the document and send a response that clearly indicates whether you DO SUPPORT or DO NOT SUPPORT adoption of this draft as a WG item.  Please send any feedback or comments about the draft in a separate thread.
> 
> Thank you,
> Margaret
> 
> (For the radext co-chairs, Margaret Cullen & Valery Smyslov)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext