IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Extended IDs

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C1A128896; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:15:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSdvC1CzchMv; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FC0126D3F; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:15:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.25] (198-84-205-59.cpe.teksavvy.com [198.84.205.59]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E60D11C0; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <D657FE58.E17B6%acee@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:15:20 -0500
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, "radext-ads@ietf.org" <radext-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3DD57A26-3B4F-4EAB-AC6E-CB2F0126B917@deployingradius.com>
References: <fef698a5-9802-c9be-04d7-1e869651c988@restena.lu> <dfd0ff02-c9e8-7253-4fb4-1e6def3e93b2@restena.lu> <8BD2C2F2-D42E-4B84-8F86-3A803160DD74@cisco.com> <b6ed7a87de434ea4a39f584a92e933b9@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <285C5C94-578E-4293-81A2-9D73E1105ABE@deployingradius.com> <8DE62B3C-D2FA-4467-9CCE-7F8D039B87E2@cisco.com> <alpine.WNT.2.21.1.1712041849350.2252@smurf> <c75160a5-1196-bdbd-f313-108085ea0c37@restena.lu> <D65692C4.E13AA%acee@cisco.com> <cf5f59f1-c2ba-9dad-7ce0-c2afdd8e55e4@restena.lu> <D657FE58.E17B6%acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/fjpNP5ODIOXVB9cDSRxXfsy9yCs>
Subject: Re: [radext] Extended IDs
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:15:31 -0000

On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> Of course, I meant a WG individual contributor and not a contributor to
> the documents. Normally, you’d speak "as a chair" only when you are
> addressing WG process and not when you are making technical comments.

  To be fair, deciding which topics are on point is part of the WG process, and within the bounds of a chairs discretion.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email