Re: [radext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-05: (with COMMENT)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 13 August 2018 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD28B130EED; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJa7-wQGw_1m; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BAC128CF3; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.20.32] (CPEf4cc55220745-CM64777ddff610.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [173.32.191.82]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BCDFD1; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <153416114103.25041.1808333930520958934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:40:48 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, radext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy@ietf.org, radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C61E065-2EFD-431B-923C-C130B32E35FA@deployingradius.com>
References: <153416114103.25041.1808333930520958934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/fqGwV8JeAd8kgHNvQlQ1pWESGZs>
Subject: Re: [radext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:40:56 -0000

> On Aug 13, 2018, at 7:52 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-05: No Objection

> Thanks for this well-written doc.
> 
> One nit in sec 3.1: s/activee/active/

  Fixed/

> One quick question on sec 3.3:
> "Operator-NAS-Identifier MUST NOT occur more than once in a packet."
> What happens if it occurs more than once? Just ignore or send an error?

  Ignore it.   I'll add some text:


If a packet contains more than one Operator-NAS-Identifier,
implementations MUST treat the second and subsequent attributes as
"invalid attributes", as discussed in [RFC6929] Section 2.8.