[radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365
"radext issue tracker" <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sat, 22 December 2012 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8875021F8ABA for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:36:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5r0GWhGbC+wB for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EBA21F89A4 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:36:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43636 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1TmXgX-0000OH-1O; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:36:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: radext issue tracker <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: aland@deployingradius.com, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com
X-Trac-Project: radext
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:36:49 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/146
Message-ID: <066.d7856f6a412e6225fc72caaacf5fd2b6@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 146
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: aland@deployingradius.com, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, radext@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: radext@ietf.org
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:36:57 -0000
#146: Terminology and RFC 6365 I would encourage this document to reference and use the terminology defined in RFC 6365. In particular, the terms "normalization", "canonicalization" and "locale" are defined there. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | aland@deployingradius.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: RFC4282bis | Version: 1.0 Severity: Candidate WG Document | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/146> radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
- [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 Sam Hartman
- Re: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 Alan DeKok
- Re: [radext] #146: Terminology and RFC 6365 Sam Hartman