Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <jsalowey@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A635011E8162 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:21:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YYnoQD4XAIT for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52721E8169 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:21:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3523; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383870105; x=1385079705; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=N9K9QXdsjMWQeegVlno7McRQ1IvP1JTWpoE9kQDBHsU=; b=IQU9VHHLkmaN6G9FG9tpHOxCeYmAJ4LJ+MK5C0MiCuIQHXfeXQrhq7xz 4o8fjF86CBR6wscnJDPkefr291iVLEBzRAA2aLPy+XhYN6bF/RSDV4R/c MUN4ty9UXNvv9Z7kRsWv92kU2odm0VoKGa+m3RHG+LtD2sjkNX6DvOvpp s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAJMtfFKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwc4U6w6klaBKBZ0giYBAQQ6PxACAQg2EDIlAgQOBYdvAw8NvTuMZ4FDfDMHgyCBEAOWIoFqgS+JI4IAA4U1gyaCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,655,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="282182527"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2013 00:21:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA80LiCV029106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 00:21:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.122]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:21:44 -0600
From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
To: "<radext@ietf.org>" <radext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info
Thread-Index: AQHO3BiAHo+me4ltlUKeaZ7NeyjODw==
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:21:43 +0000
Message-ID: <2721A7E9-A3EA-48B1-A04A-439A9795BC65@cisco.com>
References: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org> <081.5af36284efbab97c92cf7df8fa0dde3f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <081.5af36284efbab97c92cf7df8fa0dde3f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.85.165.166]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E33DAED7E6F48F4D9F3434DAFE01A934@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "<draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:21:52 -0000
The resolution to this issue looks good. Cheers, Joe On Oct 20, 2013, at 4:50 PM, radext issue tracker <trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org> wrote: > #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info > > > Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com): > > Updated text: > > 2.8. EAPoL-Announcement > > Description > > The EAPoL-Announcement Attribute contains EAPoL-Announcement Type > Length Value Tuples (TLVs) defined within Table 11-8 of > IEEE-802.1X [IEEE-802.1X]. > > Zero or more EAPoL-Announcement attributes are permitted within an > Access-Request, Access-Accept, Access-Challenge, Access-Reject, > Accounting-Request, CoA-Request or Disconnect-Request packet. > > When included within an Access-Request packet, EAPoL-Announcement > attributes contain EAPoL-Announcement TLVs that the user sent in > an EAPoL-Announcement. When included within an Access-Accept, > Access-Challenge, Access-Reject, CoA-Request or Disconnect-Request > packet, EAPoL-Announcement attributes contain EAPoL-Announcement > TLVs that the NAS is to send to the user in a unicast EAPoL- > Announcement. When sent within an Accounting-Request packet, > EAPoL-Announcment attributes contain EAPoL-Announcement TLVs that > the NAS has most recently sent to the user in a unicast EAPoL- > Announcement. > > A summary of the EAPoL-Announcement Attribute format is shown > below. The fields are transmitted from left to right. > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | String... > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > Code > > TBD7 > > Length > >> =3 > > String > > The String field is one or more octets, containing EAPoL- > Announcement TLVs in the format defined in Figure 11-8 of Section > 11.12 of [IEEE-802.1X]. Any EAPoL-Announcement TLV Type MAY be > included within an EAPoL-Announcement Attribute, including > Organizationally Specific TLVs. If multiple EAPoL-Announcement > attributes are present in a packet, their String fields MUST be > concatenated before being parsed for EAPoL-Announcement TLVs; this > allows EAPoL-Announcement TLVs longer than 253 octets to be > transported by RADIUS. Similarly, EAPoL-Announcement TLVs larger > than 253 octets MUST be fragmented between multiple EAPoL- > Announcement attributes. > > -- > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- > bernard_aboba@hotmail.com | ieee802ext@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: reopened > Priority: critical | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: ieee802ext | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: > Keywords: | > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/153#comment:7> > radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/> >
- [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info lionel.morand
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Bernard Aboba
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info lionel.morand
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Bernard Aboba
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Bernard Aboba
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info radext issue tracker