IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Thu, 20 March 2014 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8591A08D1 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PM146FIOX8Qa for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75AD1A03DD for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB0B206C0; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:26:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r70aeQSkJJbN; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:26:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [172.56.30.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:26:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 1CA1C81160; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:26:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <53285DE2.9040802@cisco.com> <035801cf42d2$99464b80$cbd2e280$@augustcellars.com> <5328C172.5080305@deployingradius.com> <14050.1395325355@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:26:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <14050.1395325355@sandelman.ca> (Michael Richardson's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:22:35 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslbnx0vnty.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/hhWTBAGwyXpz9xgqP89Y5YaZ6AE
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:26:35 -0000

My preference is that we try publishing with the updates on 6929, and if
that fails, then we just ignore things.

I would rather not create an IANA registry for these bits.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email