Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-06: (with COMMENT)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 12 October 2016 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8BE129520; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9T5fJH60q7do; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FFD129477; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740B51F70; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-server.vmhost2.networkradius.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iK7WzzKTCWlk; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.20.14] (69-196-165-104.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.165.104]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4E30A6D; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH4XGW1c7kt7oCVjXtXiZmk6S+1tA2OuoUMKfKVPUEHGmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4A496E2D-A2D0-4BB9-8CFE-B606BCFF1174@deployingradius.com>
References: <147137707081.22859.2851427602812447816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHbuEH4XGW1c7kt7oCVjXtXiZmk6S+1tA2OuoUMKfKVPUEHGmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ir2iJYJUeMFwb6m7jz-RGefrl1Q>
Cc: Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, draft-ietf-radext-datatypes@ietf.org, radext-chairs@ietf.org, radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:03:40 -0000

> In Section 4.1, if the registration policy is Standards Action doesn't
> that obviate the need to say anything about IETF Review?

 Yes.  I'll update the draft.

  Alan DeKok.