IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB91A0310 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rT1iiP59oi7m for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718131A0309 for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B952240333; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:16:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMA5AndLNpgc; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Thor.local (unknown [70.50.219.241]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2D722240168; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:16:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53D2AD02.1040400@deployingradius.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:16:18 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
References: <mailman.0.1406300368.3016.radext@ietf.org> <D1A82475-4CAA-49D8-A2E3-AC07F4879F15@freeradius.org> <53D2A648.6090606@deployingradius.com> <tsl1tt96z10.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl1tt96z10.fsf@mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/k2OvrHAyrtKObmgIg_-nOQn1pfw
Cc: radext@ietf.org, Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:16:56 -0000

Sam Hartman wrote:
> Is this in accounting document, an authorization document or both?

  Right now, the IPFix document is both.  It provides ways for the
RADIUS server to request accounting on specific flows.  And for the NAS
to send accounting for those flows.

  The "behave" document is accounting only.  The NAS pro-actively
informs the RADIUS server that it has allocated ports to a user.

  I believe that the two uses can be supported by the IPFix document,
with minimal changes to it.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email