Subject: Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback
From: Arran Cudbard-Bell <[email-masked]>
To: Alan DeKok <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Jouni Korhonen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:02:31 -0400
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>

On 26 Jul 2014, at 09:01, Arran Cudbard-Bell <[email-masked]> wrote:

> 
>>> On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just for my clarification, we did not handle draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext during the meeting, thus which document is meant here then? I assume draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext is meant here, right.
> 
> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01 appears to be a retitled version of draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext with some updates.
> 
> My points all still apply to draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext.

make that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext

> Alan's point about IPFIX still applies. 
> 
> draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext does now use Sub-TLVs.

and draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.