IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 20 March 2013 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F5C21F89A6 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjxFC3HYc+HP for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439321F8B9F for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD398201E2; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id B8E07447D; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
References: <20130128155031.8392.45953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5147172F.8090100@restena.lu> <08fd01ce23f5$cf8d0b90$6ea722b0$@augustcellars.com> <tslfvzsvd24.fsf@mit.edu> <091f01ce240a$6705a860$3510f920$@augustcellars.com> <51476C2C.5070000@deployingradius.com> <5148192B.90507@restena.lu> <514868A0.2040207@deployingradius.com> <5148822F.5070708@restena.lu> <5148A6FB.9050807@deployingradius.com> <51497429.9090607@restena.lu>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:12:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <51497429.9090607@restena.lu> (Stefan Winter's message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:32:41 +0100")
Message-ID: <tsld2uumd07.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:12:18 -0000

With regard to the i18n issues, having asked others to look at it, I'm
withdrawing my objection.  I simply don't have time to be a driving
force behind confirming that my concerns are real and going through a
joint education process here as I learn Alan's side and try and explain
my concerns.  If people from the apps area look at the document and
choose to raise their own concerns, that's fine. However I want to make
it clear to the chairs and WG that in terms of judging consensus on the
document I'm not objecting.

--Sam

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status