Re: [radext] saslprepbis and NAI
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 28 November 2014 10:14 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8671A1AA3; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 02:14:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-zrPKLnZElq; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 02:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381BC1A1A99; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 02:14:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1191; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1417169698; x=1418379298; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qCdnVabsGsYOzuNvcS3WJ8E11Pe9QielwcmjQ+WF0Dg=; b=Y7bc8aXaa5v9HhzbsJsCZHPR3qTuMejA8YQ5RfspKXTlmuXYdLIDH/eh A6NoWF3woi5lo5tRMqUeq5z2g9kHpGEEeqkWlxmS3C/ZFnU5fUJ+MipZ0 ESIHrg4gbdbGuSerW9nfo4X8MlwASWdkGJt41JMpIx8FLPnlDICXWwbgU A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoEAANKeFStJssW/2dsb2JhbABbg1fIDQqFeFUCgSIBAQEBAX2EAwEBBAEBATU2BgQRCyEWDwkDAgECARUwBgEMBgIBAYg8DdIXAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFgSRAoRNAQSXTIc1gTWDWYJ+jxCDfT4wgkoBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,475,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="253278822"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2014 10:14:56 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sASAEt0B005870; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:14:55 GMT
Message-ID: <54784B1F.5090909@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:14:55 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, precis@ietf.org, "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
References: <54660EE5.50503@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <54660EE5.50503@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/p0lG6ZBrbIEmpxI7I5JIRGzNFPk
Subject: Re: [radext] saslprepbis and NAI
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:14:59 -0000
Dear all, Please note that draft-ietf-radext-nai-11 is the IESG telechat next Thursday. Regards, Benoit > The RADEXT WG is in the last stages of publishing the updated NAI > document: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-nai-10 > > This defines a standard for "username@realm" handling, where "realm" > is a fully qualified hostname. It would be useful to reference that > from the saslprepbis document. > > The NAI is used for EAP (802.1X), AAA, 3GPP, and international roaming. > > The NAI is a subset of the "userpart" defined in Section 3.1 of the > saslprepbis document, in that it *requires* "username@realm", and the > "realm" part is a fully qualified domain name. > > Hmm... I've just noticed that the ABNF in the NAI allows for IP > addresses in the "realm" portion. That's not the intent. I'll have to > go fix that. > > I'd like to be sure that the NAI document is compatible with (or at > least not in violent disagreement with) the precis work. > > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >
- [radext] saslprepbis and NAI Alan DeKok
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Sam Hartman
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Alan DeKok
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Alan DeKok
- Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [radext] saslprepbis and NAI Benoit Claise