Re: [radext] Adoption call for draft-hartman-radext-bigger-packets

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 24 March 2014 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AB61A0269 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNTIya91uC2m for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100681A0236 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833D02240179; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:46:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YhfPNTxdWyp7; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:46:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Thor.local (bas1-ottawa11-1176224686.dsl.bell.ca [70.27.195.174]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9F1A2240107; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:46:16 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <53306157.7060309@deployingradius.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:46:15 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Deacon <peterd@iea-software.com>
References: <907DC0B0-6E00-4179-BE37-17C89810A9EC@gmail.com> <alpine.WNT.2.11.1403240855250.12912@SMURF>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.11.1403240855250.12912@SMURF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/t9wmR8ao8ZYa2lZdfuC7QTyALoY
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption call for draft-hartman-radext-bigger-packets
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:46:21 -0000

Peter Deacon wrote:
> I do not support adoption at this time.  Seeing value in continuing to
> support UDP/DTLS no bridge is available for CoA and Accounting.  Noting
> also did not support rational in Alex's draft for ignoring this issue
> for reasons explained in detail earlier on this list.

  That is unnecessary, for reasons explained in detail earlier on this list.

> If systems are to start transmitting more than max size I prefer a less
> permissive environment where some indication of support is required up
> front prior to transmitting larger messages.  It can be a manual setting
> or an automatic "discovery" yet would prefer something "MUST" be indicated.

  The draft discusses negotiation of large packets, which seems to
address the above concerns.

  Alan DeKok.