Re: [radext] #176 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate?

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Wed, 08 October 2014 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40861ACE36 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.685
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.685 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bJ5Vesa57zdH for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [158.64.1.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE571A9100 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CB7411D9 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5434D288.10706@restena.lu>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:58:32 +0200
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <065.18ebd81ae64d013f63a780221f34a543@trac.tools.ietf.org> <080.9a2e1df74be9770b33e997f44000d29c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <080.9a2e1df74be9770b33e997f44000d29c@trac.tools.ietf.org>
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FJqML44VDmL8pfhaFNisuxvPJaPTaUKgI"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/vFxIg5olz5XLeVHkszbmodRs-18
Subject: Re: [radext] #176 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:58:36 -0000

Hi,

>  I'll change it in last call.  I don't think it's worth doing a new rev for
>  this one change.

ACK, I'll keep the ticket open as a reminder.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66