[radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Fri, 09 December 2016 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E1E4712953D; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEB4129657 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vDtmQF-G0Nf for <xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58AE112953D for <draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE0E1657; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 68943C204EE; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-935820@icann.org> <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-19767-1481310073-638.935820-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #935820
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20161209190115.E1E4712953D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/wQ5ipCiLrJgzGyaqlMWiZcXYvkA>
Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, lionel.morand@orange.com
Subject: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:01:16 -0000

Kathleen and Lionel,

This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 will remain in our queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry being created by Section 7.3 is OK.

When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us to make these registrations, but didn't identify the registry. 

thanks,
Amanda

On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote:
> Lionel and Kathleen,
> 
> Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of
> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK?
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval-comment@iana.org>:
> >
> > > Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan,
> > >
> > > Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after
> > > only
> > > one day.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Amanda
> > >
> > > On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote:
> > >> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan,
> > >>
> > >> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have uploaded
> > >> a
> > >> new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port
> > >> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3.
> > >>
> > >> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the same
> > >> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged in.
> > >>
> > >> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK?
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Amanda Baber
> > >> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> > >> PTI