IETF Logo Mail Archive

[radext] Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK

Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2024 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF66C14F68D for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzvfklwdD5Py for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4B1C14F61C for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6b798e07246so1639096d6.2 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721853461; x=1722458261; darn=ietf.org; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9roDgwIa/gWQHjbs1rQCjt2/kyf21ROSakljNk0FZgY=; b=VMF5crpVpvTBZeOxHdCMkRg+wRuhkgam2ao0EdbmIg9a5smcCx9HzbWMo9T0AEV69D EZCLKwZwgnxYI7MQ3UkwDhRUPeb5wXd0oJA25CHMwUH6+QZuFmYJ7/53fF4AY2BV3ToC Ljawek6oh/SlnRMNUqQzZrbN5In6omO0OLnzRPRA2dIn7M+cgTtR3jdaqMkdaMN89hnU Dw6ixLXaZ52keYu/kgn2JRTtuTgXHOunWl9gO+zi9KPM+CZEqKpbqm9h73GBYvkv7T0X M2CiK+HHXtqnccsZxoIpdO8VjAzDlZj6yQYBtuxEa+tSLOCp5bBj/0yTfXXdJpGepxxG rb9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721853461; x=1722458261; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9roDgwIa/gWQHjbs1rQCjt2/kyf21ROSakljNk0FZgY=; b=vuk9wRWtKhsdhrUwnkRcq8fWA6gD9hWGUAFlvvCKawgIkZ7Zh8KrjjrC6J0c9Ki0d+ cecCh/KF+/J+kQ5iADslk1IT0Z98uhL6oh+vm3ZMH1Tk1nQGAzC249/ueO2zphY396I/ CHxRZjqcfqkbFDE5FJj0CKHcarS6PbWlmHqk4Z8+btTkl4c94L2mE3BM8JMhAZYD6Idm M61mcu+V9e31bo+QLq4tPvpeI65gKz8ULkeboJtLcMBO1PWPbO46xzmmOwI8logaEVkt G3keS7pKSMzBMhvu0FteFDbLNOl8ZDHvgWpopc8xTzVmNkkbv1uoTfT5pCJRP8ZgDVLS 5qOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeYPUpqDviHVGZeO85apLa2XfYhNs3BH7HH+mi4vJZOKsriOOL Yx8hgpdJiUFL2ze9n3CNUMWfo8+7gCCDaeHYhYRqGJJy6/WTLoEpiXxKpA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF9RM2s0JTVTrPWWx2ILsmU+9+5s9IWG95G0lBcnQ43qmA9NOWyA/FlhzNPqrTRE3kzN4x8Mg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5014:b0:6b5:e6b3:72f9 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6bb3c9d516dmr11819346d6.9.1721853461350; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2607:fb91:1413:972d:bd4b:5693:a2f6:4972]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6b7ac7e1fe8sm61494226d6.48.2024.07.24.13.37.40 for <radext@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-EBA3F244-37C5-4DEA-8188-4BF1A573FC80"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <E66DC2E7-1D48-4B9F-BB3D-1D87D1E25F61@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:37:29 -0400
To: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: MRPDACQWPDD3NZZMLB4TPEK4KUTREBQJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: MRPDACQWPDD3NZZMLB4TPEK4KUTREBQJ
X-MailFrom: mrcullen42@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-radext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [radext] Selfie Attack on TLS-PSK
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/xL-WDfrtFEqxb6SI9PUFk7r70OQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:radext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:radext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:radext-leave@ietf.org>

On a separate but related note…. 

I came across this attack while reading about TLS mutual authentication:


Is this something we should consider before we recommend the use of TLS-PSK with TLS 1.3? Or has this issues already been addressed?

Thanks,
Margaret




v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status