IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xue-radext-key-management-00.txt

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF6721E808C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzU+bqrnwgwc for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s15.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s15.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA92921E808B for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W85 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s15.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:35:33 -0700
X-EIP: [NmRqUVqx/mXzeZMygj1TA5xT7JzZiFlAFND9CxpuxBU=]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W85A8986E0763F33B71E88A93D30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_968c4e6a-6594-4f07-938e-718d868e03d5_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, "xueli@huawei.com" <xueli@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:35:33 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <515596D8.1000209@restena.lu>
References: <01FE63842C181246BBE4CF183BD159B4482A1371@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <515596D8.1000209@restena.lu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2013 21:35:33.0792 (UTC) FILETIME=[580F9A00:01CE2CC5]
Subject: Re: [radext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xue-radext-key-management-00.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:35:38 -0000

[BA] Also, RFC 5247 desribes the security issues that can arise when splitting the AP function. 
 Stefan Winter said: 
 
"You attempt to split the role of the Access Point into several
sub-entities. This is admirable, but by no means a novelty. There are
many proprietary approaches to this, but there's also already a set of
RFCs describing a standard way:"

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status